Well, it's previously established that he's largely immune to massive doses of radiation...Darkflame wrote:So that more leaves the question, can a time lord survive a direct strike by that much electricity?
The Dr Who thread
I think this, and Arron's recent posts in general, have got it absolutely right. It's frustrating to watch New Who because it tends to combine a few excellent ideas, humour and a great sense of fun and characterisation with pointlessly lazy plotting. How hard is it to make up internally consistent resolutions to most episodes? How many times have fans suggested very small modifications which would make episodes hugely more coherent? And for that matter, dramatic and satisfying.arron wrote: It is getting to the point of being silly, cranking out improbable story elements and deus ex machina endings like some bad B-Movie or kids saturday morning cartoon.
I'm sick of being told "It's just for kids", or "Stop over-analysing it". I'm not a moron, and actually, neither are kids. Russell T. Davies and writers: Stop being so bloody lazy with your plotting. It's not hard. If a bunch of no-talent internet fans like us can end stories sensibly, so can you.
Bog is right. Listen to Bog.Bog wrote:A lot of it's in how they fly. The Daleks in "Muppets Take Skaro", sorry "Daleks in Manhattan" were swooshing and swooping around. This wasn't cool. The Dalek shape is not suited to swooshing. Nor is the Dalek attitude.
The way the eponym in "Dalek" flew was, in fact, scary as hell. It didn't swizz around like a Huey in a cheap post-Platoon vietnam movie, it stalked through the air. From it's slide up the stairs to it's glide into the room full of soliders, it moved with that sinister deliberation, owning it's patch of sky. Even the ranks of flying daleks in "Parting of the Ways" or the last ep with Rose had that deliberation.
Talking of jumping sharks, frankly I think that's what the Daleks did in this story.
Why are you breaking my kayak?
I think this series has been much better, but I think its the concepts more then anything else.Dio wrote:I dunno. It annoying me a lot less than the last series' it's-not-about-the-Doctor attitude, so I'm finding I quite enjoy this series so far. I do agree that will probably wear thin a bit if it doesn't improve though.
Also, I prefer this companion so far.
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
- piku
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 20960
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:44 am 0
- Website: Http://Www.ncot.uk
- Location: Wakefield
- Contact:
Because you can't simply wipe out the Doctor's nemesis in a simple "kazap byebye!" moment. Haven't you read the "101 tricks to prolong a franchise" book?Sir_LANs-a-lot wrote:Why did Dalek Caan instigate another "Emergency Temporal Shift"? - It's not like the Doctor was armed and about to destroy him in some way.
It should have gone back a few hours and said "Look, zap the one-eyed tentacle weirdo. The Doctor is coming through that door in five minutes so zap him too". We could have had a fun time-shifting episode that leaves the universe in a nasty tangled knot.
Less talking to your victims, just zap them and be done with it. Shoot first, scream "EXTERMINATE!" after.
return (0);



