4 Wheels - 4 Litre Engine and Powerfull as HELL BABY!!!

[Markie]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

[piku]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

[PVB]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

Waxing what?!

[Markie]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

Waxing what?!

oOOO MISSES!

[Meow]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

[Markie]

wow ... 2 hours of waxing! Polishing and all that ... worked up quite a sweat! Lookiing good mind.

Totally ... be expecting pix tomorrow!

[Markie]

I dream of thee ...

[mattley]

Top call, C'mon Markie, get some pics up.


Sorry I can't let this go.

If I see Eubank^H^H^H markie's truck I'm going to set fire to it, so the no smoking problem is probably moot.

Why would you do that?

Is it simply jealousy that urges you to destroy something that someone has worked hard to attain?

Or is this just a 4X4 thing and you've become so suckered into the green lie that you actually believe that destroying an existing vehicle will help? How? by stimulating demand for another ton of steel to be dug out of the ground to make something a little bit smaller?

Either way you're a fucking retard.

[goldfish]

Or is this just a 4X4 thing and you've become so suckered into the green lie that you actually believe that destroying an existing vehicle will help?

I'm sure if Kalmar's prepared to burn the car of as nice a chap as Markie, he's not going to leave it at just the one, so the overall impact will be more noticeable over time. In much the same way that Markie not buying such a car may not make much of a difference (to 'the green lie'... *yawn*), but lots of people changing their behaviour probably would.

Simon

[kalmar]

Top call, C'mon Markie, get some pics up.


Sorry I can't let this go.

If I see Eubank^H^H^H markie's truck I'm going to set fire to it, so the no smoking problem is probably moot.

Why would you do that?

It's what we earth humans refer to as "a joke". Apologies for any blood vessels you may have just burst though

[mattley]

Or is this just a 4X4 thing and you've become so suckered into the green lie that you actually believe that destroying an existing vehicle will help?

I'm sure if Kalmar's prepared to burn the car of as nice a chap as Markie, he's not going to leave it at just the one, so the overall impact will be more noticeable over time. In much the same way that Markie not buying such a car may not make much of a difference (to 'the green lie'... *yawn*), but lots of people changing their behaviour probably would.

Simon

The point you're missing is that Markie hasn't bought a new car, he's extending the life of a car that already exists therefore extending it's life as an existing car. To threaten to set fire to it is unacceptable. To suggest that burning enough 4X4s might be useful denigrates your position further.

/Goldfish added to retard list.

[mattley]

It's what we earth humans refer to as "a joke". Apologies for any blood vessels you may have just burst though

Since when did threatening to set fire to a man's car if you saw it become a joke?

[goldfish]

The point you're missing is that Markie hasn't bought a new car, he's extending the life of a car that already exists therefore extending it's life as an existing car.

So, joining in with your humourless extension of this pointless debate, what you're saying is that Mark buying a 4 litre tank rather than a similarly priced and aged, 'greener' car is environmentally equivalent. Because he's extending the life of the tank. Logic (and humour) fail by Mattley.

Simon

[mattley]

Not at all.

The logic, backed up by the facts, dictate that running an older car is "greener" that running a new car regardless of anything.

The humor fails at arson.

[goldfish]

The logic, backed up by the facts, dictate that running an older car is "greener" that running a new car regardless of anything.

How tedious. As I said, if the choice is between two old cars, and one is greener than the other (as is likely to be the case in comparison to Markie's), the other car is "greener". Repeating the same fallacy doesn't make it a fact Mattley.

Simon