Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay
- Louis G
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:27 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: guts n gums
- Yahoo Messenger: louismgavin
- Location: Leicester, UK
- Contact:
Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb
Glad I moved away from torrent sites to usenet
Winehaus imports wines from South Germany. The Baden-Wurttemberg region makes dry reds and whites, and with its warmer climate, stylistically has much in common with Burgundy.
http://www.winehaus.co.uk
http://www.winehaus.co.uk
-
llamaprotector
- Baaaa!

- Posts: 648
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:00 am 0
Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb
OK which mod made the thread title even less accurate, the judge's ruling puts the requirement for ISPs to ban it one major step closer not less likely!
Interestingly TPB have pretty much settled on just magnet inks for all new additions today and removed .torrent file download links. This is a shit load of fuck as you can't select files from multi-file torrents or choose the location when using magnet links. If they are sooooo untouchable why fuck the site up?
Either way TPB can just fuck right off with this inferior system.
Interestingly TPB have pretty much settled on just magnet inks for all new additions today and removed .torrent file download links. This is a shit load of fuck as you can't select files from multi-file torrents or choose the location when using magnet links. If they are sooooo untouchable why fuck the site up?
Either way TPB can just fuck right off with this inferior system.
Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb
Eh? Other way round, surely? Censorship is taking active steps to stop you doing something, whereas surveillance is just watching you do it.Darkflame wrote:Thats easy, censorship is passive, surveillance is active.
Why are you breaking my kayak?
