SuperMappy wrote:Drudge Report homepage. Not sure if I should laugh or be terrified!?
What, of JPEG or other compression artefacts? That’s all I see there. No doubt that photo is available at a high quality: someone has gone to some trouble compressing it to generate the worst possible effect.
SuperMappy wrote:Drudge Report homepage. Not sure if I should laugh or be terrified!?
What, of JPEG or other compression artefacts? That’s all I see there. No doubt that photo is available at a high quality: someone has gone to some trouble compressing it to generate the worst possible effect.
It's like playing a record backwards. If you can infer something sinister it's clearly because there was something sinister there to infer.
Angels don't get JPEG artefacts. That's a scientific fact proved by information theorists the world over.
Well this is interesting. Torygraph uses undercover reporters to catch a Trump superPAC willing to accept money from a Chinese donor in return for influence with Trump. It's illegal in the states for foriegn nationals to fund anyone running for political office but that's what they're happy to do, even details how the money will be laundered into the campaign.
Whatever you think about the Telegraph they've got a knack for undercover stings.
Hopefully this'll go big. Firewall's between PACs and candidates means it likely won't taint Trump but it should be disastrous for the PAC and in turn hopefully throw a bit of spanner in Trump's fundraising abilities
Browsing alt-right and other nutjob fascist forums for your material again I see.
Megyn Kelly v Newt Gingrich, one of the few supporters of Trump stupid enough to go on camera and try and defend Trump. Gingrich really twists himself in knots here, first denying polls then denying or trying to dismiss Trump’s sexual assaults. Leading Democrats are solidly behind Clinton, but leading Republicans are staying clear of Trump. So Gingrich is about the best person he has, to go on TV and defend him – though anyone would have a hard time defending Trump against Kelly’s pointed, unflustered questioning.