(assuming the picture link works)



.. it doesn't ... ( the link )Jamesac wrote:Can't say I was planning on it but-
(assuming the picture link works)
I see high tech tits balancing on two stone mushrooms, the bottom one is possibly a penis.KlaxonCow wrote:I see a picture of a boxed Quest 2 on top of a bunch of stacked rocks. So I presume that it's working for me, at least.

NOW you got my attention !kel wrote:I see high tech tits balancing on two stone mushrooms, the bottom one is possibly a penis.KlaxonCow wrote:I see a picture of a boxed Quest 2 on top of a bunch of stacked rocks. So I presume that it's working for me, at least.
I also saw that, but didn't want to embarrass the Quest 2 by drawing attention to her "wardrobe malfunction".kel wrote:I see high tech tits

For DEVELOPMENT, did not think it was 'good enough' for streaming, but turns out it IS, I use a 2M USB cable I am 99% convinced I bought on amazon but can't find it anywhere ( maybe was Yak that bought it dunno ).Cloudane wrote:Ordered the Quest 2.
Ars slammed it but it seems he was mostly in a rage about the Facebook issue and went in with a negative outlook (almost 'wanting' to hate it) which I think biased his review. Most other reviews are fairly positive. Black levels sound disappointing but I don't play many "dark" games so not the end of the world.
My IPD is about 70-70.5 putting me in the 10% it's not designed for, but having tried the CV1 and my dad's Quest1 (surprisingly better image quality than the CV1, it has to be said) both at 68 seem okay to me.
RMD a Link cable that doesn't cost £90? Or is it best to just splash out, does the fibre optic make much difference? 4m as with the CV1 seems fine.
Edit: FAQ suggests this one https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01MZIPYPY/
I think I'd rather pay £13 than 90!