SPACE

Inane baanter or words of wisdom - you decide...
Post Reply
User avatar
Stone
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 14497
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: thestony1
Location: Harpenden

Re: SPACE

Post by Stone »

There was some NASA prototype ages ago that was a little robot that trundled along the lunar surface, gobbling regolith in one end and spitting neatly-laid (though pretty inefficient) solar cells out the back, via a solar collector/fractional distillation process in the middle to get the silicon out. Even at half a percent efficiency, just being able to leave something to autonomously create a massive solar farm would produce oodles of power and be dead convenient.

So long as someone remembers to add an off switch, otherwise we'd end up with a reflective moon :D

Stone
User avatar
Sir_LANs-a-lot
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 12143
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 1:00 am 0
Location: Here

Re: SPACE

Post by Sir_LANs-a-lot »

Stone wrote:There was some NASA prototype ages ago that was a little robot that trundled along the lunar surface, gobbling regolith in one end and spitting neatly-laid (though pretty inefficient) solar cells out the back, via a solar collector/fractional distillation process in the middle to get the silicon out. Even at half a percent efficiency, just being able to leave something to autonomously create a massive solar farm would produce oodles of power and be dead convenient.

So long as someone remembers to add an off switch, otherwise we'd end up with a reflective moon :D

Stone
Image

That's no moon!
[Sir_LANs-a-lot]

Meat is murder.
Tasty, tasty murder.
User avatar
F-ZeroOne
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8208
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:27 pm 0

Re: SPACE

Post by F-ZeroOne »

Slightly worrying news from the Russian space programme; very worrying news if you're about to take-off in a Soyuz:

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/22 ... zors-edge/
"Stars don't twinkle in space." - Char Aznable.
User avatar
Zoot
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7431
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 9:11 pm 0

Re: SPACE

Post by Zoot »

F-ZeroOne wrote:Slightly worrying news from the Russian space programme; very worrying news if you're about to take-off in a Soyuz:

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/22 ... zors-edge/
Taking off isn't the worrying bit, it's getting back 8O
User avatar
benedictw
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6012
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:44 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: CoderBen
Location: Poole, UK
Contact:

Re: SPACE

Post by benedictw »

Crickey. Glad they got back in one piece.
Gamertag\PSN: CoderBen
User avatar
WiteWulf
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10125
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:20 am 0
PSN: WiteWulf
Location: Loughborough(ish)

Re: SPACE

Post by WiteWulf »

Soyuz capsules have always been a bit hairy, I understand. I'm reading 'Too Far From Home' a the moment, a book about the three astronauts who got stuck on ISS after Columbia went down, and there's as much background on the Russian space programme as the American and it's all a bit of an eye-opener. If you've read 'For All Mankind', too, the contrast is sometimes startling.
:::G:::

PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
User avatar
Zoot
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7431
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 9:11 pm 0

Re: SPACE

Post by Zoot »

WiteWulf wrote:Soyuz capsules have always been a bit hairy, I understand. I'm reading 'Too Far From Home' a the moment, a book about the three astronauts who got stuck on ISS after Columbia went down, and there's as much background on the Russian space programme as the American and it's all a bit of an eye-opener. If you've read 'For All Mankind', too, the contrast is sometimes startling.
Ooh, thanks, WW, despite my addiction to teh whole space thing, I hadn't clocked on what must have happened to the ones left behind after Columbia. Just ordered!
User avatar
WiteWulf
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10125
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:20 am 0
PSN: WiteWulf
Location: Loughborough(ish)

Re: SPACE

Post by WiteWulf »

Zoot wrote:
WiteWulf wrote:Soyuz capsules have always been a bit hairy, I understand. I'm reading 'Too Far From Home' a the moment, a book about the three astronauts who got stuck on ISS after Columbia went down, and there's as much background on the Russian space programme as the American and it's all a bit of an eye-opener. If you've read 'For All Mankind', too, the contrast is sometimes startling.
Ooh, thanks, WW, despite my addiction to teh whole space thing, I hadn't clocked on what must have happened to the ones left behind after Columbia. Just ordered!
It's a very informative and interesting book but my only real criticism is that the writing style is a little, ahm, florid...very American...it's their Myth Busters to our Horizon, if you will.
:::G:::

PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
User avatar
F-ZeroOne
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8208
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:27 pm 0

Re: SPACE

Post by F-ZeroOne »

Zoot wrote:
F-ZeroOne wrote:Slightly worrying news from the Russian space programme; very worrying news if you're about to take-off in a Soyuz:

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/22 ... zors-edge/
Taking off isn't the worrying bit, it's getting back 8O
Well, thats sort of what I'm getting at - if you're about to be flung into a near-complete vacuum on top of a tremendously complicated metal tube full of some of the most explosive fuel ever used in humankinds endeavours, you don't really want to have to worry about the landing as well, do you? :)

Those interested in near-space disasters may also want to read "Dragonfly", which is about the Mir space station.
"Stars don't twinkle in space." - Char Aznable.
User avatar
WiteWulf
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10125
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:20 am 0
PSN: WiteWulf
Location: Loughborough(ish)

Re: SPACE

Post by WiteWulf »

F-ZeroOne wrote:
Those interested in near-space disasters may also want to read "Dragonfly", which is about the Mir space station.
Heh...there are quite a few Mir and Salyut horror stories in Too Far From Home, too :)
:::G:::

PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
User avatar
axel000
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2905
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:02 am 0
PSN: huckwee
Location: Philadelphia, USA

Re: SPACE

Post by axel000 »

Its a shame none of the presidential candidates running for office appear to really have a vision for reengerizing the NASA mission. The constellation class vehicles are underfunded and needed in 2010, not 2016/18 whenever they actually enter operational use.

This isn't an argument to push manned spaceflight ahead of robotics\; probes are just as important, i'm arguing that NASA as a whole is underfunded when you consider the scientific and engineering advances and opportunities that come about from a healthy space industry.

Now that the global economy is in a recession (to be confirmed soon enough) budgets are going to be under even more pressure...and we are going to be reliant on soyuz even longer than originally planned for ISS duties. Now, if the ESA could get their new cargo vehicle man rated.....

Alternatively, this incident also opens a small window for a private firm such as Virgin Galactic or SpaceX to bring a orbit-capable craft to market. Unlikely but rarely do opportunities like this present themselves. If I was an engineer at Scaled Composites I'd be designing an orbit capable craft right now - there is a definate need for another one for ISS duties, and this could also lead to a civilian hypersonic transport vehicle for ballistic travel (say London to Beijing in 1 hr).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gamertags:
[Steam] scottish_usa
[PSN] huckwee
[Star Citizen] Zander9
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
Wumpus4x4
Baaa!
Baaa!
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2002 8:15 pm 0
Location: Merry Olde England

Re: SPACE

Post by Wumpus4x4 »

axel000 wrote:Its a shame none of the presidential candidates running for office appear to really have a vision for reengerizing the NASA mission. The constellation class vehicles are underfunded and needed in 2010, not 2016/18 whenever they actually enter operational use.

This isn't an argument to push manned spaceflight ahead of robotics\; probes are just as important, i'm arguing that NASA as a whole is underfunded when you consider the scientific and engineering advances and opportunities that come about from a healthy space industry.

Now that the global economy is in a recession (to be confirmed soon enough) budgets are going to be under even more pressure...and we are going to be reliant on soyuz even longer than originally planned for ISS duties. Now, if the ESA could get their new cargo vehicle man rated.....
It is*. That's why the UK doesn't contribute towards funding it (because UK Govt. policy is not to fund manned space-flight). Which is why what little money the UK taxpayer does spend on space is spent very efficiently on space technology. Which is why the UK space industry continues to punch well above its weight. Which is (probably) why a Brit is in charge of making ATV work.
axel000 wrote:Alternatively, this incident also opens a small window for a private firm such as Virgin Galactic or SpaceX to bring a orbit-capable craft to market.
That's exactly what SpaceX has planned. Using Nasa money to get started. http://www.spacex.com/dragon.php
axel000 wrote: Unlikely but rarely do opportunities like this present themselves. If I was an engineer at Scaled Composites I'd be designing an orbit capable craft right now - there is a definate need for another one for ISS duties, and this could also lead to a civilian hypersonic transport vehicle for ballistic travel (say London to Beijing in 1 hr).
SC have more pressing problems at the moment. Routine ballistic travel to/from the other side of the planet sort of needs some serious head-scratching over global energy supplies to be fruitful first, as it's staggeringly inefficient.

To go back to Soyuz, even in a last-ditch "computer says 'nyet'" mode, it brought its passengers back alive and well. A returning shuttle with no functioning control system would simply break up.

*to use the industry-standard meaning of the term. Of course it isn't man-rated for launch (but the Ariane 5 launcher was designed from the outset with that in mind) and, more fundamentally, it's not designed to come back in one piece.
Bog
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 15767
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 2:01 pm 0
Location: Los Angeles, California, Sol 3

Re: SPACE

Post by Bog »

axel000 wrote:Alternatively, this incident also opens a small window for a private firm such as Virgin Galactic or SpaceX to bring a orbit-capable craft to market. Unlikely but rarely do opportunities like this present themselves. If I was an engineer at Scaled Composites I'd be designing an orbit capable craft right now - there is a definate need for another one for ISS duties, and this could also lead to a civilian hypersonic transport vehicle for ballistic travel (say London to Beijing in 1 hr).
I spent Tuesday with Burt Rutan's son, Jeff. Don't sweat it - the window ain't getting missed.
User avatar
axel000
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2905
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:02 am 0
PSN: huckwee
Location: Philadelphia, USA

Re: SPACE

Post by axel000 »

nudge nudge wink wink say no more :wink:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gamertags:
[Steam] scottish_usa
[PSN] huckwee
[Star Citizen] Zander9
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
zip accident
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13928
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:58 pm 0
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: SPACE

Post by zip accident »

Bog wrote:

Don't sweat it - the window ain't getting missed.
I hope that's true. I don't have any faith in the capacity of small scale private enterprise being enough for this, but I wish all serious attempts at achieving orbit well.
"My way is the way of not fighting":- the book of Enter the Dragon.
Post Reply