The Dr Who thread
Has any sci-fi actualy established what a life scanner is anyway? :p
~sigh~Flabio wrote:If you're going to pick fault with the physics of a sci-fi show we'll be here all night![]()
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
- Harlequin
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6505
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
- Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.
Of course, silly. It is a device which scans for signs of life.Darkflame wrote:Has any sci-fi actualy established what a life scanner is anyway? :p
Especially in Doctor Who.Darkflame wrote:~sigh~Flabio wrote:If you're going to pick fault with the physics of a sci-fi show we'll be here all night![]()
H. (reversing the neutron polarity of the cricket ball propulsion system)
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
Well, I just see science gaps as things to be avoided.
Its ok if its a technology we dont understand, as long as its not a technology we do understand used wrong.
I think one of the best examples of how sci-fi should be done was on Farscape.
Some of the charecters are shrunk down in a tube, and they are discusing all the points about how whats happening to them is "impossible".
(eg, how can they we breath? the oxygen particals would be too big for our lungs! ect).
The other charecter points out that it dosnt mater, because it is happening to them, and they got better things to worry about then the 'how'.
In sci-fi, the impossible (to us) is allowed because we can safely assume its just future or alien technology. Just because we dont understand something, dosnt make it magic.
But when technology that isnt impossible to us is used, with words and ideas relateing to present day technology, then it should be made to fit in as best as possible with ideas we have today.
I cant offhand remember any occasion in Farscape were they misused 'earth-science' concepts or terminology. (
It isnt sci-fi's job to educate, but its a nice bonus if it does.
And, when a sci-fi makes a slight cock-up, either to do with real science,
or relateing to its own self consistancy, then pointing it out is part of being a fan of the show.
For me at least.
Its ok if its a technology we dont understand, as long as its not a technology we do understand used wrong.
I think one of the best examples of how sci-fi should be done was on Farscape.
Some of the charecters are shrunk down in a tube, and they are discusing all the points about how whats happening to them is "impossible".
(eg, how can they we breath? the oxygen particals would be too big for our lungs! ect).
The other charecter points out that it dosnt mater, because it is happening to them, and they got better things to worry about then the 'how'.
In sci-fi, the impossible (to us) is allowed because we can safely assume its just future or alien technology. Just because we dont understand something, dosnt make it magic.
But when technology that isnt impossible to us is used, with words and ideas relateing to present day technology, then it should be made to fit in as best as possible with ideas we have today.
I cant offhand remember any occasion in Farscape were they misused 'earth-science' concepts or terminology. (
It isnt sci-fi's job to educate, but its a nice bonus if it does.
And, when a sci-fi makes a slight cock-up, either to do with real science,
or relateing to its own self consistancy, then pointing it out is part of being a fan of the show.
For me at least.
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
I've never once seen a sci-fi show where everything in space is utterly silent.
I don't let it bother me. If I wanted to pick on stuff in todays I could go into...
1) theres no way they were only 42 minutes away from that star, based on the opening shot they were a very long way away. Unless it was a very small star.
2) People not in pressure suits going outside a ship will pop messily, not drift romantically.
But I don't. Cause it's sci-fi and I expect it to be a bit economical with what science it chooses to use.
I don't let it bother me. If I wanted to pick on stuff in todays I could go into...
1) theres no way they were only 42 minutes away from that star, based on the opening shot they were a very long way away. Unless it was a very small star.
2) People not in pressure suits going outside a ship will pop messily, not drift romantically.
But I don't. Cause it's sci-fi and I expect it to be a bit economical with what science it chooses to use.
- PVB
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 32542
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 10:16 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: PVBuk
- PSN: PVBuk
- Location: Medway, U.K.
Not bad, but was too much like the one of the ship going into the black hole.
1. Spaceship plummeting towards 'certain' doom.
2. Crew turn into murderous 'zombies' controlled by other entity.
I'll give it 6/10.
Edit:
Oh, and in Confidential RTD stated that it was the first episode based soley on a space ship.
1. Spaceship plummeting towards 'certain' doom.
2. Crew turn into murderous 'zombies' controlled by other entity.
I'll give it 6/10.
Edit:
Oh, and in Confidential RTD stated that it was the first episode based soley on a space ship.
- Harlequin
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6505
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
- Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.
Hardly any DW story for over 42 years has been hard Science Fiction, despite the series' original brief. It has mostly been Sci-Fi, fantasy with SF concepts and trimmings; more Star Wars than 2001: A Space Odyssey.
If one requires consistent accurate representations of proper science then I am afraid that one is watching the wrong family adventure show.
If one requires consistent accurate representations of proper science then I am afraid that one is watching the wrong family adventure show.
I think that is was both, in part, along with the reversal of digits from a popular U.S. series featuring 'real-time' clock watching.Sir_LANs-a-lot wrote:Ah. I thought it was some kind of homage to Hitchhikers.HGFB wrote:The episode took place in real time across 42 minutes. Didn't you notice the countdown going on? It started at 42 minutes and a few seconds.Sir_LANs-a-lot wrote:What was the significance of the "42" title?
Are you two referring to The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit which was set in a station on, as the title of the first part suggests, a planet orbiting a black hole?Flabio wrote:The two parter last season was on a space station plumeting into a black hole. It was on a moon.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
- PVB
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 32542
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 10:16 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: PVBuk
- PSN: PVBuk
- Location: Medway, U.K.
I thought it was a ship against a large rock.Flabio wrote:It was, of the new stuff. The two parter last season was on a space station plumeting into a black hole. It was on a moon.PVB wrote:Oh, and in Confidential RTD stated that it was the first episode based soley on a space ship.
I just wanted to be Petty, okay?
-
Bog
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 15767
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 2:01 pm 0
- Location: Los Angeles, California, Sol 3
Yay! Not Cardiff!
I rather enjoyed that. Now if we can just send someone around to drag Stereotypical Meddling Mother-Unit off to a nice, safe broom-closet for the rest of the season. I mean, really - the Gubment types who were there. Who the smeg would be around people like that and not just spontaneously realise they were Utter, Utter Bastards(tm)?
I rather enjoyed that. Now if we can just send someone around to drag Stereotypical Meddling Mother-Unit off to a nice, safe broom-closet for the rest of the season. I mean, really - the Gubment types who were there. Who the smeg would be around people like that and not just spontaneously realise they were Utter, Utter Bastards(tm)?
- CarlBillen
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 3:34 pm 0
- Location: Belgium
I wasn't set afire by that episode...
I found that it was all 'very shouty'. At one point I wasn't able to understand what they were shouting about
. This made, however, the silent bit in the middle stand out more...
For me the episode can be described by 'shouting and running and shouting some more'
. It was probably very exciting for the kids, but it didn't work for me.
But after I've seen it, I thought 'time to watch Buffy's Hush episode again'...
I found that it was all 'very shouty'. At one point I wasn't able to understand what they were shouting about
For me the episode can be described by 'shouting and running and shouting some more'
But after I've seen it, I thought 'time to watch Buffy's Hush episode again'...
- Governmentyard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11757
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
- Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard

