It would roughly fit if it's a 1.0 GHz LV part to a 1.6 GHz stock part.Firefox wrote:I know it's 3.5W at 1GHz from those benchmarks from last week, I can't see it jumping to 10W for an extra 600MHz.Kemper_Boyd wrote:Those benchmarks would be a hell of a lot more useful with the power.
Atom has a TDP of 2W at 1.6 GHz, as far as I know Via has not disclosed
TDP for Isaiah yet. It is said to be 20 W at 2.0 GHz, if so I'd be surprised
if Isaiah is under 10 W at 1.6 GHz and stock voltages.
I've not been able to find a statement from Via saying what Isaiah's power
is. They've said the performance is 2x C7 at the same power, which does fit
the benchmarks. The 20W TDP at 2.0 GHz figure is the only one I've found
that is said to be verified by Centaur.
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.h ... VzaWFzdA==
Let's assume that 3.5 W at 1.0 GHz is correct, and that we can trust
CrystalMark. If we can then the 1.0 GHz Isaiah is slower than Atom and
would still use more power, and likely cost quite a bit more to make.
I know I keep making the same point but a single core 2.0 GHz 20 W part will
find it tough competing against Merom and Penryn, never mind Atom.





