The Sony PS3 thread (apparently *still* obnoxious!)
-
Kronos
Thread title is just a joke sheesh
. I can't really see the PS3 not selling at least 1/3 of what the PS1 or PS2 sold in their lifespans, which would still be enough to be no1 let alone survive and that's just based on the games it plays. I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360. But the gameplay trailers have come along so much, and yet the 360s graphical output for fast paced games hasn't really improved (Testdrive, Carbon, even Moto GP glitches on some aspects in replays etc) so I'm not worried about this being "teh f4Ll of teh s0nyZ" etc
RE:Gears of War Vs Resistance...are you crazy??? Can you not see the chugging and tearing when you pan your viewpoint, can't you see the difference in animation smoothness REGARDLESS of what is happening on screen? Gears of Wars has improved A LOT and is quite impressive (thinking of buying it if 360 doesn't sell actually) but if you think graphically it is up to Resistance .......
FPS is fine, if done well, saying "Oh no not another FPS" is ok for you but I counter with "Oh no, not another childish plinky plonky mario game gahhhh" Horses for courses
FPS with not enough people online, ok now that IS *shit* I agree.
End of the day I bought all my last 4 consoles correctly for a specific game not fanboyism (WRC, Colin McRae 3, NFS Most Wanted, honestly can't remember the one I got my GC for but keeping it around for hope of a cheap copy of RE4 anyway) aslong as you like what you spent your money on then that's fine. If the premium 360 was £100 less would be worth it, if Wii was £100-125ish then it would be worth a punt, and I guess honestly £100-£150 less PS3 without Blu-Ray would have been a nice thing to offer too sure. 360 has good 3rd party support, but I would be worried that yet again Nintendo will die on its lack of 3rd party support especially over here.
RE:Gears of War Vs Resistance...are you crazy??? Can you not see the chugging and tearing when you pan your viewpoint, can't you see the difference in animation smoothness REGARDLESS of what is happening on screen? Gears of Wars has improved A LOT and is quite impressive (thinking of buying it if 360 doesn't sell actually) but if you think graphically it is up to Resistance .......
FPS is fine, if done well, saying "Oh no not another FPS" is ok for you but I counter with "Oh no, not another childish plinky plonky mario game gahhhh" Horses for courses
End of the day I bought all my last 4 consoles correctly for a specific game not fanboyism (WRC, Colin McRae 3, NFS Most Wanted, honestly can't remember the one I got my GC for but keeping it around for hope of a cheap copy of RE4 anyway) aslong as you like what you spent your money on then that's fine. If the premium 360 was £100 less would be worth it, if Wii was £100-125ish then it would be worth a punt, and I guess honestly £100-£150 less PS3 without Blu-Ray would have been a nice thing to offer too sure. 360 has good 3rd party support, but I would be worried that yet again Nintendo will die on its lack of 3rd party support especially over here.
It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.
- sponge
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:05 am 0
- Location: Twatting around in Los Angeles, California.
Re: PS3 Superiority and general validation of arrogance for
Resistance. Ick. Shhhhh -Part of why I left that company was to avoid working on that game.Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Well seeing as it is the best of the "next gen" console (not that there are any others really) about time we had a single thread for all things PS3 no?
So to kick off....
Resistance:Fall of man is looking smoother and smoother with each posted vid, this is probably going to be the one that sells it for me. So polished it shines through a lead door! Check out the Gamersday uploads on GT, the tell tale sign of well coded graphics is the lack of screen tear when rotating the viewpoint during action
Anyone know what's happening with that quirky little title we were teased with called "Afrika" ages ago??
Also anyone have PS3 specific vids for NFS:Carbon (the ones on GT are for the 360, and contrary to what everyone said there is still lag on the full retail copy of that game too)
- Kemper_Boyd
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11967
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0
Unless there's some top secret unannounced feature to the RSX it is inferiorfrak wrote:It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.
to the 360 GPU.
- Duck Turkin
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:51 am 0
- Location: Down South
WTF?Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Thread title is just a joke sheesh. I can't really see the PS3 not selling at least 1/3 of what the PS1 or PS2 sold in their lifespans, which would still be enough to be no1 let alone survive and that's just based on the games it plays. I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360. But the gameplay trailers have come along so much, and yet the 360s graphical output for fast paced games hasn't really improved (Testdrive, Carbon, even Moto GP glitches on some aspects in replays etc) so I'm not worried about this being "teh f4Ll of teh s0nyZ" etc
RE:Gears of War Vs Resistance...are you crazy??? Can you not see the chugging and tearing when you pan your viewpoint, can't you see the difference in animation smoothness REGARDLESS of what is happening on screen? Gears of Wars has improved A LOT and is quite impressive (thinking of buying it if 360 doesn't sell actually) but if you think graphically it is up to Resistance .......
FPS is fine, if done well, saying "Oh no not another FPS" is ok for you but I counter with "Oh no, not another childish plinky plonky mario game gahhhh" Horses for coursesFPS with not enough people online, ok now that IS *shit* I agree.
End of the day I bought all my last 4 consoles correctly for a specific game not fanboyism (WRC, Colin McRae 3, NFS Most Wanted, honestly can't remember the one I got my GC for but keeping it around for hope of a cheap copy of RE4 anyway) aslong as you like what you spent your money on then that's fine. If the premium 360 was £100 less would be worth it, if Wii was £100-125ish then it would be worth a punt, and I guess honestly £100-£150 less PS3 without Blu-Ray would have been a nice thing to offer too sure. 360 has good 3rd party support, but I would be worried that yet again Nintendo will die on its lack of 3rd party support especially over here.
Mhm, something like that. I was mostly interested in Resistance. It seems good but a bit overhyped, something the score perhaps reflects. I'm interested if the same thing will happen to GoW. But of course, it's a western FPS being reviewed in Japan, so in that regard perhaps 33/40 is not half bad, as Eurogamer pointed out?Deckard wrote:So just a review of some assorted games rather than a full hardware launch review ?Marius wrote:Noooo. that is a link to an article that gives us the scores given by Famitsu, sillyDeckard wrote:Thats a review ?
- disciple
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 13941
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:33 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: LiberMentis
- PSN: Prime_Heretic
- Location: Greenfield
- Contact:
Re: PS3 Superiority and general validation of arrogance for
It certainly is the best!Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Well seeing as it is the best of the "next gen" console (not that there are any others really) about time we had a single thread for all things PS3 no?
Those non-jerky games are my favourite type too!Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:So to kick off....
Resistance:Fall of man is looking smoother and smoother with each posted vid, this is probably going to be the one that sells it for me.
PS4 : Prime_Heretic
Steam: bitstorm
Elite Dangerous: Cmdr Britain
Steam: bitstorm
Elite Dangerous: Cmdr Britain
ObSaK you should be propaganda manager of any selfrespecting dictatorship. Your name would mean gold. 
Armed with a Cintiq+4+bless I'm off to fight bad taste!
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
-
Kronos
-
Kronos
Not worried personally, worried because I've gone from Outrun 2,Rallysport 2 and Colin McRea 4/5 ultra slick goodness to supposed next gen laggy rubbish which looks all the worse for its bloom lighting and HDRfrak wrote:It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.
If it was out in the shops today there would be one in my house now so that's not really an issue. The point was I was getting fed up with next gen stuff looking like games running on slightly under powered PCs for their requirements...whats the point in that *meh*
Nothing secret a 6 series chip did seam a bit mean for the specs, I'm guessing the polished titles just manage to make good use of Cell & RSX together.Kemper_Boyd wrote:Unless there's some top secret unannounced feature to the RSX it is inferiorfrak wrote:It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.
to the 360 GPU.




