...see gaming has some interesting characters
The spread in all these reviews just look like the glass-half-full vs. glass-half-empty effect to me. The Wii is such a different approach that personal prejudices seem to get hugely amplified.
Look at Jeff Gerstman's Gamespot LoZ:TP review vs Matt Casamassina's review. They both actually point out similar negatives:
. The game is an evolution of LoZ:OoT
. The graphics haven't really advanced over the Gamecube (other than use of widescreen)
. Neither has the sound (it is at heart a gamecube game after all)
. There's still no voice acting,
. The fights are somewhat superficial.
Where they differ is in how much they feel any of this matters. Matt concentrates more on what's right and less on what's wrong, whereas Jeff takes pretty much the opposite view. Personally i think Matt nails what the spirit of what Zelda is about, whereas Jeff seems to want Zelda to be a Playstation FPS. This bias also comes out in their different assessments of the length of the game (if you ignore sidequests in Zelda, you've completely missed the point), and the validity of the controller.
Two different viewpoints, two different reviews. No problem. What i do think is wrong though is:
1. Each reviewer should declare their prejudices. That way you can read the review bearing in mind how much their preferences overlap with yours.
2. Scoring a game out of 100 (or with decimals), or even out of 20 (or with half points) is simply a case of spurious accuracy. It means nothing, as the margin for error is far larger. You just have to look at the list of
Gamespot reviews ranked by score to see this at work. I don't believe an impartial observer would have ranked Zelda:TP below many of the games that scored 8.9 or higher on that list.
The granularity of the Edge scoring system is a far better approach (very few games have achieved an Edge 10, and each one that did offered something ground-breaking for it's time, against which a 9 for Zelda:TP seems perfectly reasonable). Even then, scores below 5 really just mean don't buy, so why bother with that range?
5 grades are all you really need to adequately guide the prospective buyer (along with an informative, insightful review that conveys the spirit of the game):
0 - forget it
1 - rent
2 - worth buying
3 - must have
4 - ground breaking
Sadly such honesty requires a) the publication not being the publishers' bitch and b) the reviewer being somewhat more mature than an overgrown adolescent male.