I was totally flummoxed for a good 5 mins or so unitl it suddenly sprung to mind.
Weird.


They pronounce router rout-er. Which makes IT conversations about networks odd with me saying route-er and them saying rout-er.Yak wrote:The Yanks pronounce those two the same, which is bloody funny when you hear it.zip accident wrote:In the pronunciation stakes, what about "route", the way to a place, and "rout", a severe military defeat, involving soldiers running away from the enemy.

Don't they speak English that bears a closer semblance to 17th century English than us?Penguin wrote:Did have an annoying experience in NYC last year mind where the shop-assistant didn't understand my Home Counties accent, and asked me to "Speak English please". The put-down temptation was obvious but I'm not that kinda guy who wants an argument when it doesn't matter. Made me angry, but there is bigger things in life to get annoyed about.


They pronounce router rout-er. Which makes IT conversations about networks odd with me saying route-er and them saying rout-er.[/quoteGuru-Meditation wrote:Yak wrote:The Yanks pronounce those two the same, which is bloody funny when you hear it.zip accident wrote:In the pronunciation stakes, what about "route", the way to a place, and "rout", a severe military defeat, involving soldiers running away from the enemy.

At the AMS UUNET NOC (may she rest in piece), we used route-er. Then, when communicating with ther German OC, we had to use rout-er. Speaking with the French, I'm not sure what they wanted, but route-er was the sane choice. The Swedish preferred rout-er, the Belgian ops route-er. Lastly, whenever we actually talked to the US guys in Ashburn, we had to use rout-er again.Bog wrote: So does Auerole, and he's got a doctorate from Cambridge. That muddies the waters a bit.


French would be route-er, seeing as the French version of the word is almost the same, just with a longer ou and -er soundWibble wrote:At the AMS UUNET NOC (may she rest in piece), we used route-er. Then, when communicating with ther German OC, we had to use rout-er. Speaking with the French, I'm not sure what they wanted, but route-er was the sane choice. The Swedish preferred rout-er, the Belgian ops route-er. Lastly, whenever we actually talked to the US guys in Ashburn, we had to use rout-er again.Bog wrote: So does Auerole, and he's got a doctorate from Cambridge. That muddies the waters a bit.
Not surprising we preferred using IRC.
To me, it'll always be route-er (rooter). It just feels right.
-W
Bollocks to thatBog wrote:
However, being outnumbered 5:1 by the people who invented the Internet in the first place, if they want to call them rout-erz, I feel obliged to please the majority. It is a democracy, after all.


That's what people say, yes, but how on earth did they work that one out without a microphone that can break the light barrier? I think someone just made it up so no-one would make fun of Kevin Costner's performance in Robin Hood: Prince of Theives.Guru-Meditation wrote:Don't they speak English that bears a closer semblance to 17th century English than us?![]()