FOOTBALL: Season 2006/07 Discussion Thread

Inane baanter or words of wisdom - you decide...
Post Reply
User avatar
KevG
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2361
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 7:38 pm 0
Location: Doldrumia

Post by KevG »

Dio wrote:I'm not sure about the commercial part. Before the Premiership (and the Sky money, around about the same time), I don't know if it would have been possible to build a commercial entity the way Kenyon did at Man U.
My recollection of Utd pre-Sky was that they always seemed to be more on the ball commercially though. Of course relatively speaking it was nothing like we have now, but back then Utd seemed to have more nous when it came to getting their name 'out there'.

It's more frustration on my part I suppose: LFC could have done a whole lot more but seemed to be content to sstay in the 50's-60's mind set. There ws a story about how all the lightbulbs at Anfield where changed down to 40w to save money! Dunno how true that was but it sort of encapsulates what I felt our postition was.
User avatar
goldfish
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 4:18 pm 0

Post by goldfish »

I can remember as a kid Man U always having a groundswell of support long before they were actually winning something. It wasn't so much a commercial thing, as status as everyone's favourite second choice team, if that makes any sense.

Maybe it was a Munich thing?

Simon
"Who put the 'ram' in the 'ram-a-lam-a-ding-dong'?"
User avatar
Zoot
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7431
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 9:11 pm 0

Post by Zoot »

Dio wrote:I'm not sure about the commercial part. Before the Premiership (and the Sky money, around about the same time), I don't know if it would have been possible to build a commercial entity the way Kenyon did at Man U.

That needed international exposure that before near-worldwide multi-channel television I doubt would have been possible.

Man U had the 'luck' to be on top at that point, which by a feedback loop made it relatively easy to build up the club, and a substantial percentage of the England team to make it easy for English supporters to pick them as a second team (a tactic that Chelsea have clearly tried to duplicate wherever an English player has been identified as near world-class).
Not sure that I agree with you on that one, Dio - I'm with Goldfish (hey, Zoot's back in the footie thread!).

United have always been the best supported team worldwide (don't go quoting figues at me Liverpool fanboys :D ) and I think that it is partly to do with Munich and partly because United were the first in Europe in teh 50's so were exposed early. And, of course, they had a pretty good team in those days then too, so the "Beckham" effect was present then as well.

Oh, and "Nine points, nine points, nine points, nine points"........

Of course, Chelski may well be level by the time we next play, but it's good whilst it lasts. I'm an arsenal fan today - hurrah!
User avatar
Zoot
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7431
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 9:11 pm 0

Post by Zoot »

:D

Come ON, you arsenal!
User avatar
Governmentyard
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11757
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard

Post by Governmentyard »

goldfish wrote:I can remember as a kid Man U always having a groundswell of support long before they were actually winning something. It wasn't so much a commercial thing, as status as everyone's favourite second choice team, if that makes any sense.

Maybe it was a Munich thing?

Simon
It was a 'not Liverpool' thing. They still aren't Liverpool, and I still love them for it :)
XBox Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Everything else: governmentyard
User avatar
Guru-Meditation
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4093
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:46 am 0
Location: Bellevue near Seattle
Contact:

Post by Guru-Meditation »

Zoot wrote:Oh, and "Nine points, nine points, nine points, nine points"........
We're only 16 points behind you!
passplay> is anyone else sitting with their balls gently nestled in a bowl of red jello?
User avatar
Col
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2164
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:40 pm 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Col »

West Ham United have today announced the departure from the Club of Alan Pardew.

Alan has made an important contribution since joining as manager in September 2003 but this season's results have been disappointing and have left the Club in a very difficult position.

The Chairman, Mr Eggert Magnusson, and the Board have been concerned by the performances of recent weeks and feel that it is the right time to make a change in the best interests of the Club.

Mr Magnusson and the Board would like to place on the record their thanks to Alan Pardew for his hard work and commitment and to wish him well for the future.

The search for a successor is now underway in order that a new manager can be in place ahead of the January transfer window.

First Team Coach Kevin Keen will take temporary charge of team affairs until a new appointment has been made. No further statements on this matter will be made by the Club before that time.
User avatar
goldfish
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2002 4:18 pm 0

Post by goldfish »

That's unbelievably crass. He got the team into Europe and the FA cup final, and then been turned upside down by the transfer/club sale saga.

Sad.

Bet the next Reading/West Ham will have some amusing comment...

Simon
"Who put the 'ram' in the 'ram-a-lam-a-ding-dong'?"
User avatar
M
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 2:26 pm 0
Location: Madrid

Post by M »

Elvis has left the building...

What a mess at Tynie these days :evil:
A última hora siempre ha sido un pelotón de soldados el que ha salvado la civilización
- quoted by Javier Cercas in Soldados de Salamina
User avatar
PaulEMoz
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11795
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 12:00 am 0
Yahoo Messenger: paulemoz
Location: The Devil's Temple, 5th Floor.
Contact:

Post by PaulEMoz »

Looks like Sven's gonna be back in business then, boys....
User avatar
Dio
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 1:08 pm 0
Location: Newcastle UK

Post by Dio »

Looks like we didn't have a shot at Chelsea. In that case we deserve to lose.
User avatar
fog
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6022
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:08 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: Dense Fog
PSN: DenseFog
Location: Newcastle, England
Contact:

Post by fog »

Dio wrote:Looks like we didn't have a shot at Chelsea. In that case we deserve to lose.
Where did you hear that? Just watched it and we more than held our own in the first half with Sibierski hitting the cross bar.

Second half we were under pressure for periods but were never totally out of it with a couple of half chances late on to snatch a point.
User avatar
Governmentyard
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11757
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard

Post by Governmentyard »

fog wrote: Just watched it and we more than held our own in the first half with Sibierski hitting the cross bar.

Second half we were under pressure for periods but were never totally out of it with a couple of half chances late on to snatch a point.
Reading that, you sound like the average deluded Forest fan of two seasons back. No offence, honestly, but you do - you sound just like I used to.

Neewcastle are probably doomed.
XBox Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Everything else: governmentyard
User avatar
Dio
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 1:08 pm 0
Location: Newcastle UK

Post by Dio »

Naah, as we've showed, we are better than that at the moment.

Now I reread the BBC commentary we did have 4 shots, so that's better.
User avatar
Col
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2164
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:40 pm 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Col »

West Ham didn't waste any time then. :D
Post Reply