Is it just me or are people fucking thick?

Every now and then a Llamasoftie will say something interesting. Honestly! This is where we will keep these topics so that they don't get deleted.
User avatar
kalmar
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8293
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:46 pm 0
Location: Fife

Post by kalmar »

goldfish wrote:To save me going through every page of this thread, can someone tell me where Jedburgh posted that in fact, it's 'he' that's the idiot in this particular case...?

Cheers,
Simon
I think on about page 2 he admits he flunked physics or something, if that helps :)
(just show, no stabby stabby)
User avatar
Jedburgh
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 5904
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:50 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: dariusjedburgh23
Location: Uncanny Valley

Post by Jedburgh »

You're all doing very well.

Carry on.
Jedburgh

It's all about trying to work out what the fuck is going on.
User avatar
tufty
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 12523
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:52 pm 0
Location: French Alps

Post by tufty »

Bog wrote:And, if you're running the engines - <snippage> You have linear thrust, shoving backwards, rolling the treadmill the other way.
Ummm. Nope.

Engines spooled up, causing a massflow through themselves, which I also assume to be pointing directly backwards and it's not a harrier or a WIG aircraft etc etc, resulting in an equal and opposite force acting on the motors themselves, and thus to the airframe to which they are attached. And not to the treadmill (except by the secondary and rather smaller action of air friction caused by air entrained by the main massflow through the engines and then impinging on the treadmill).

If the motors acted directly on the treadmill, then they would, in the normal case of things, be acting *directly on the ground*, at which point you would not be able to accelerate an aircraft as soon as it took off. One could, of course, achieve this situation "relatively simply" by attaching wings to the body of a car such that takeoff speed was lower than the maximum speed attainable by the car (with wings attached, obviously). Put the car on a runway. Floor the accelerator pedal. Super-flying-car rushes down the runway, reaches takeoff speed, lifts, and, suddenly, there is no power accelerating it any more. It's a glider. As it inevitably loses speed, it will touch down again.

Aircraft motors act on the medium through which the aircraft is moving to create a motion relative to that medium. Motion relative to the gound or any other point is irrelevant to the flight of an aircraft. It could not be otherwise.

Similarly, the "rocket with the big fan" thought experiment is pointless. Rocket motors don't "push" on anything, they create mass flow. They move mass (fuel) from the rocket and accelerating it backwards out of the motor, one way or another. Once thefuel or residue is out of the rocket, it ceases to have any effect on anything except the external environment. This is why rocket motors work in a vacuum; they don't have to "push" on anything except the fuel they are ejecting.

So, it doesn't matter what you do to the ejected fuel, how many big fans you put in the exhaust stream, the simple fact of having ejected the fuel will create thrust acting on the motors, and the rocket will lift off. If you don't want the rocket to accelerate, then don't start the motors.

Simon
"massive retard™", "full of shit™", "tiny bitch™", "retarted™", "a bit of a one trick pony™", "petty™", "simple minded idealistic twat™", "miserable humourless fucker™"
User avatar
kalmar
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8293
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:46 pm 0
Location: Fife

Post by kalmar »

Bog wrote: you sap-gnawing anencephalic art critic????
It's because I've got a Mac, isn't it?
You're just jealous.
~D4T45H4T~ wrote:
I can't tell if thats a joke or not?
No offence should be taken, but no, it's not a joke.
Seriously, you can understand that analogy (the bike on the treadmill) and agree it's the same thing as the plane one, and therefore how the treadmill bit is basically irrelevant. Right?
(just show, no stabby stabby)
User avatar
Mir Nyet
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:48 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: Mir_Nyet
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Mir Nyet »

The amount of force one would have to transfer into the wheels from the rolling road would be so large it would simply overwhelm the contact patches of the planes wheels. In all likelyhood, the plane would slide, or begin to bounce on the rolling road because of this but once the engines throttled up, then it is game over for the rolling road unless it physically tipped the plane over.

My inital thought was that it would be possible to dampen the thrust enough to cause the plane problems, but looking at the size of the wheels on most planes, it just would not happen... If the plane was mounted on large skids, then you might have a chance due to the increased contact area, but I doubt it...

:D
User avatar
piku
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 20960
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:44 am 0
Website: Http://Www.ncot.uk
Location: Wakefield
Contact:

Post by piku »

Bog wrote:The wind's not moving.

The wing's not moving.
Hurrah! Someone else with sense, reasoning and logical thought has woken up.
Why are we still trying to find an answer to something that's fucking obvious? Let's have more pixies, those at least have comedy value.
I predict this will continually loop around and around, polarising this forum into one of three groups:

"Crazed loons who think the plane will fly"
"Sensible people who know it won't"
"Followers of the holy flying Pixie"

We will then have a small religious war and the winners will become the next overlord of the planet. Naturally, being overlords they'll be flying and therefore require pixies.
return (0);
User avatar
kalmar
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8293
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:46 pm 0
Location: Fife

Post by kalmar »

piku wrote:
Bog wrote:The wind's not moving.

The wing's not moving.
Hurrah! Someone else with sense, reasoning and logical thought has woken up.
Oh shush. Of course the wing's bloody moving. Why wouldn't it?
8)
(just show, no stabby stabby)
User avatar
piku
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 20960
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2002 10:44 am 0
Website: Http://Www.ncot.uk
Location: Wakefield
Contact:

Post by piku »

kalmar wrote:
piku wrote:
Bog wrote:The wind's not moving.

The wing's not moving.
Hurrah! Someone else with sense, reasoning and logical thought has woken up.
Oh shush. Of course the wing's bloody moving. Why wouldn't it?
8)
Pixies holding onto it... the Pixie density is too high.

This really is a damn stupid question now :) There's so much pseudo-science and misunderstanding going around here that it's like the 1800's all over again.

Please raise a hand if you believe the earth is flat and that the sun goes around it, dragged by a god.
return (0);
User avatar
Mir Nyet
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:48 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: Mir_Nyet
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Mir Nyet »

piku wrote:
kalmar wrote:
piku wrote:
Bog wrote:The wind's not moving.

The wing's not moving.
Hurrah! Someone else with sense, reasoning and logical thought has woken up.
Oh shush. Of course the wing's bloody moving. Why wouldn't it?
8)
Pixies holding onto it... the Pixie density is too high.

This really is a damn stupid question now :) There's so much pseudo-science and misunderstanding going around here that it's like the 1800's all over again.

Please raise a hand if you believe the earth is flat and that the sun goes around it, dragged by a god.



Just been reading some Pratchett, so raises hand...

:D
User avatar
Mark
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3611
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 7:53 pm 0
Location: England

Post by Mark »

Wow! This one's still going! Here's how I resolved this so I could sleep last night (could be nonsense, but worked for me):

Imagine a giant treadmill running at 100 mph. Imagine a helicopter hovering over said treadmill perfectly stationary. It lowers a freely spinning wheel on to the treadmill - what happens? The wheel spins up to 100 miles an hour and the helicopter stays pretty much where it is (it'll get pushed back a little due to friction, but it's nothing it can't counter easily). It absolutely doesn't start moving at 100 mph backwards.

You speed the treadmill up to 200 - the wheel spins at 200, the force on the copter gets a little bigger, but it can still easily maintain it's position. The helicopter raises the wheel, accelerates to 100 in the opposite direction to that of the treadmill's motion, and then lowers the wheel again. The wheel spins up to 300, the helicopter slows a tad due to friction. It's still moving at pretty much 100 mph. (It could have accelerated with the wheel down, but didn't for the sake of clarity).

At this point the magic treadmill breaks. Good! It's been confusing the issue. It can't possibly exist, because the wheel is spinning at 300 due to the combined speeds of helicopter (100mph) and treadmill (200 mph). If you speed the treadmill up to match the wheel you have to speed the wheel up again, and then the treadmill, and then the wheel etc. This was pointed out really early on in the thread (by Zip Accident, IIRC).

OK - back to the original question (kind of). The magic treadmill is impossible, so let's go for the 100mph treadmill. We've got a plane sat on it facing against the direction of travel with a top speed of 120mph, and a take-off speed of 100mph. Can it take off? Yes. The engine has the power to push the plane through the air at 120, and the fact that the ground is moving is irrelevant because it's wheels spin freely. So, it accelerates to 100 (with it's wheels spinning at 200) and then it's up (it needs a little extra power to counter the friction in the wheels, hence the higher top speed). No pixies needed, so they can sit back and enjoy the in-flight catering.
User avatar
kalmar
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8293
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:46 pm 0
Location: Fife

Post by kalmar »

You're right. What could be easier to understand?


This is a bit like that episode of Black Books, where they have a new fortress-like security system added to the shop. There is now a massive armoured door, with a small keypad on the inside of the door. Bernard can immediately see that the whole concept is flawed, the door will have no beneficial effect because to get in you first have to enter the code, but you have to be in first before you can reach the keypad, and so on. But Manny is stuck at the point where you type a code in to open the door. He keeps repeating "to open the door, simply enter the code..." But he can't remember the code anyway because he was distracted by a subbuteo player in the man's hair.


You know what, actually, I'd like to hear from Arron on this one, if he wasn't busy running about after radioactive Russians.
Perhaps the plane is really just a state of mind. Or something.
(just show, no stabby stabby)
User avatar
Mir Nyet
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:48 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: Mir_Nyet
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Mir Nyet »

kalmar wrote:You're right. What could be easier to understand?


This is a bit like that episode of Black Books, where they have a new fortress-like security system added to the shop. There is now a massive armoured door, with a small keypad on the inside of the door. Bernard can immediately see that the whole concept is flawed, the door will have no beneficial effect because to get in you first have to enter the code, but you have to be in first before you can reach the keypad, and so on. But Manny is stuck at the point where you type a code in to open the door. He keeps repeating "to open the door, simply enter the code..." But he can't remember the code anyway because he was distracted by a subbuteo player in the man's hair.


You know what, actually, I'd like to hear from Arron on this one, if he wasn't busy running about after radioactive Russians.
Perhaps the plane is really just a state of mind. Or something.

So, the plane cannot take off as there is no plane? Or some small bald kid has bent it in half?
User avatar
kalmar
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8293
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:46 pm 0
Location: Fife

Post by kalmar »

That's not a bald kid, that's Buddha, and he's REALLY ANGRY at you because you're NOT UNDERSTANDING.
(just show, no stabby stabby)
User avatar
Mir Nyet
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 684
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:48 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: Mir_Nyet
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Mir Nyet »

kalmar wrote:That's not a bald kid, that's Buddha, and he's REALLY ANGRY at you because you're NOT UNDERSTANDING.

So, the plane will not fly because Buddha bent it in half...

The bastard!
User avatar
diablo
Baaa!
Baaa!
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 9:32 am 0
PSN: WOOSABI
Location: Cardiff, Wales!
Contact:

Post by diablo »

OMG, I promised myself I would stay outta this thread but I need to join one of the groups in this here little bit of Ank Morpork.

On the assumption from the first post that the plane's situation
Jedburgh wrote:keeps it stationary. The question is, can the aeroplane take off?
The plane is not moving. The quote says so. It is stationary. No dice.

Someone mentioned a harrier jump-jet. Would an equivaltent situation be to put the harrier in a magical lift that lowered it to an infinite depth and the speed at which the jets pushed it upward?

Bigger question is, I know I am thick, but which group do I join and where can I get me some of this magic that's being used for everything?

Burn 'em all I say!
My other computer is a Sinclair
Locked