What the fuck is Russia upto?
What the fuck is Russia upto?
President Vladimir Putin has warned that Russia will aim missiles at Europe if the US goes ahead with its planned defence system! ...
"If a new missile defence system will be deployed in Europe, then we need to warn you today that we will come with a response," Mr Putin told The Times.
Madness! again ... and also, whats the difference between Balistic and Crusie missiles?
"If a new missile defence system will be deployed in Europe, then we need to warn you today that we will come with a response," Mr Putin told The Times.
Madness! again ... and also, whats the difference between Balistic and Crusie missiles?
- RedOktober
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 4788
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:15 pm 0
- Location: Stalin's Organ
- Contact:
- teamonkey
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 12082
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 1:07 am 0
- XBL Gamertag: itsthetaste
- PSN: teamonkey_ca
- Contact:
Re: What the fuck is Russia upto?
Ballistic missiles go up and over and down, like in Defcon. Cruise missiles fly like a plane.Markie wrote:whats the difference between Balistic and Crusie missiles?
Surely a more logical response would be there own defense system? :-/
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
- Kemper_Boyd
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11967
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0
They already have one. The commie bastards.Darkflame wrote:Surely a more logical response would be there own defense system? :-/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-135_anti ... ile_system
Re: What the fuck is Russia upto?
Ballistic missiles kill you in 20 minutes flat, cruise missiles might take a lot longer.teamonkey wrote:Ballistic missiles go up and over and down, like in Defcon. Cruise missiles fly like a plane.Markie wrote:whats the difference between Balistic and Crusie missiles?
Ballistic missile=big rocket, goes up in space and comes back down again, Cruise missile=a very small jet plane thingy (and pretty hard to shoot down too).
Holier than thou
- Governmentyard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11757
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
- Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard
It's a lot of pony poop. Elections are coming up in Russia shortly, and Putin was elected for his tough approach against Russia's enemies. So how best to play to the home audience? Talk tough about something that is not going to happen. He's just stirring the diplomacy.
I'm sure that if we had a nuclear war coming, then I'm sure that I'd probably know something about it based on the people I work with..
I'm sure that if we had a nuclear war coming, then I'm sure that I'd probably know something about it based on the people I work with..
"Observation is the path to understanding. Self-observation is the path to self-understanding."
- DutchLlama
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 1:09 pm 0
- Location: Fhloston Paradise with llovely Leeloo... Sweet! :)
Well maybe they're still riled over the US unilateral withdraw if the ABM treaty which limits anti missile weapons.
But I guess it may have more to do with the US embracing all former Soviet states with the exception of Russia and inviting them to join NATO. Russia itself is to remain a potential enemy (the US military and defence industry needs to have potential enemies remaining) and be put under guard by the new NATO allies with 60 second strike possibility.
The US didn't like it when the USSR stationed missiles near their borders in Cuba in 1962 and Russia doesn't like it when the US puts a gun at their head in 2007.
But I guess it may have more to do with the US embracing all former Soviet states with the exception of Russia and inviting them to join NATO. Russia itself is to remain a potential enemy (the US military and defence industry needs to have potential enemies remaining) and be put under guard by the new NATO allies with 60 second strike possibility.
The US didn't like it when the USSR stationed missiles near their borders in Cuba in 1962 and Russia doesn't like it when the US puts a gun at their head in 2007.
Boy: "Have you met monsters before?" The Doctor: "Yes."
Boy: "Are you scared of them?" The Doctor: "No, they are scared of me!"
Boy: "Are you scared of them?" The Doctor: "No, they are scared of me!"
- Kemper_Boyd
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11967
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0
That wasn't good but remember who actually had an operating nuclearDutchLlama wrote:Well maybe they're still riled over the US unilateral withdraw if the ABM treaty which limits anti missile weapons.
tipped ABM system to protect the Kremlin.
That doesn't make the slightest bit of sense when you consider how muchDutchLlama wrote:But I guess it may have more to do with the US embracing all former Soviet states with the exception of Russia and inviting them to join NATO. Russia itself is to remain a potential enemy (the US military and defence industry needs to have potential enemies remaining) and be put under guard by the new NATO allies with 60 second strike possibility.
strategic weapons programmes have been cut. The new 'print money'
cause is TWAT in case you haven't heard.
Gun to their head? A hit-to-kill ABM system? I could understand if the USDutchLlama wrote:The US didn't like it when the USSR stationed missiles near their borders in Cuba in 1962 and Russia doesn't like it when the US puts a gun at their head in 2007.
was resurrecting Project Pluto and stationing them in Eastern Europe but
this is just Putin playing the hard man, as aaron said, still it beats blowing
up your own citizens to get votes.
But how is this missile defence system a gun to their head?
Everyone should have a missile defence system.
Makes much more sense then investing in, you know, missiles.
fine by me.They already have one. The commie bastards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-135_anti ... ile_system
Everyone should have a missile defence system.
Makes much more sense then investing in, you know, missiles.
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
Re: What the fuck is Russia upto?
Nice, nice.. As usual the scare mongering masses choose to ignore the the simple differences of the various systems...Orava wrote:Ballistic missiles kill you in 20 minutes flat, cruise missiles might take a lot longer.teamonkey wrote:Ballistic missiles go up and over and down, like in Defcon. Cruise missiles fly like a plane.Markie wrote:whats the difference between Balistic and Crusie missiles?
Ballistic missile=big rocket, goes up in space and comes back down again, Cruise missile=a very small jet plane thingy (and pretty hard to shoot down too).
For the education of the spaztards here's a simple rundown of the choices yoy have..
Short-range ballistic missile (SRBM)
Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM)
Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM)
Sub-continental ballistic missile (SCBM)
Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM)
Limited range intercontinental ballistic missile
(LRICBM)Long-range ballistic missiles (LRBM)
Full range intercontinental ballistic missile (FRICBM)
Submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM)
I'll leave you to figure out to impending doom of <insert localised country>..
The user-base here continue to amaze me with their utter incredulence on these matters..
Grand Master Turing once dreamed that he was a machine. When he awoke he exclaimed:
"I don't know whether I am Turing dreaming that I am a machine, or a machine dreaming that I am Turing!''
"I don't know whether I am Turing dreaming that I am a machine, or a machine dreaming that I am Turing!''



