the refresh has persuaded me to get a refurb one from the apple store, 8gig slim, on its way,
New iPods
- Kemper_Boyd
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11967
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0
Ars have got some comparison pictures of the nano.
http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.a ... ing-photos
Even better.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipodlounger
http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.a ... ing-photos
Even better.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipodlounger
- Meatpuppet
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1116
- Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2002 4:53 pm 0
- Location: Living up north.. in an old shop.
- skip
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 1:23 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: oz_skip
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Has anyone worked out how these can be accessed on a 'regular' computer. Youtube looks rather poor on an otherwise crisp HDTV hooked up to a Mac Mini which is being used as an HTPC.Deckard wrote:Apple famously asked Google to re-encode for H264, firstly cause of the Apple TV and now as a happy knock on effect for the phone and the ipodThey are still someway off converting the lot though
- Deckard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10746
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 11:27 pm 0
- Location: Falmouth, Cornwall, UK
Odd that, as on HDTV using an Apple TV and wifi most of youtube looks surprisingly good these days and I thought the Apple TV and Mac Mini would generate the same video output ?skip wrote:Has anyone worked out how these can be accessed on a 'regular' computer. Youtube looks rather poor on an otherwise crisp HDTV hooked up to a Mac Mini which is being used as an HTPC.Deckard wrote:Apple famously asked Google to re-encode for H264, firstly cause of the Apple TV and now as a happy knock on effect for the phone and the ipodThey are still someway off converting the lot though
Now with a new Mac Mini Pro so dont judge me !
Not a lot of good though if you're on a bus, tube, car or only within range of a public wifi point charging £5 an hour.Rod_S wrote:If you're in range of a wifi connection, streaming your Last.FM radio station on the Touch is a possibility. Just thought of that 'cos I'm streaming mine on the Wii via Opera in my front room now, great way of listening to tunes and there's always your neighbours/groups/friends radio for streaming too.
Storing and managing MP3's is so last year, dahlings.
What settings were you using to get such a small file?Jimaroid wrote:I've just done a quick conversion of an episode of Heroes and it comes out at 87MB when shrunk to native screen size. The original TV rip I had was 366MB. So you can get roughly 180 TV shows of that order (45-50 minutes) onto a 16GB Touch. Not too shabby, the battery would be flat long before you watched that lot.Deckard wrote:But we are still talking 16 gig here and for that size screen eps of BSG, Lost , Simpsons are arent going to be big are they ?
- Deckard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10746
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 11:27 pm 0
- Location: Falmouth, Cornwall, UK
Quite a bit of info here and I would be surprised if any normal TV ep went about 100 meg...
http://forums.ilounge.com/archive/index.php/f-91.html
http://forums.ilounge.com/archive/index.php/f-91.html
Now with a new Mac Mini Pro so dont judge me !
-
matt
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14826
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:07 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: gingerbeardman
- PSN: wirehang
- Location: here && there
- Contact:
Probably H.264 codec?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/
matt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/
matt
I'm trying to resize an episode of lost to put on my n95 at the moment. I'm using the H.264 codec using settings recommended on an n95 blog and I ended up with a file bigger than the 300 odd meg that the original was. Hmmmm....matt wrote:Probably H.264 codec?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264
http://www.apple.com/quicktime/technologies/h264/
matt







