Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Inane baanter or words of wisdom - you decide...
llamaprotector
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:00 am 0

Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by llamaprotector »

User avatar
disciple
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13941
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:33 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: LiberMentis
PSN: Prime_Heretic
Location: Greenfield
Contact:

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by disciple »

>>Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

That's not what the article says.
PS4 : Prime_Heretic
Steam: bitstorm
Elite Dangerous: Cmdr Britain
User avatar
RedOktober
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4788
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:15 pm 0
Location: Stalin's Organ
Contact:

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by RedOktober »

Good job there aren't any other torrent sites to worry about.
Sponsoring terrorism at £1 per mile.
User avatar
techno12
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 804
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 11:51 pm 0

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by techno12 »

Pointless as people in the know can use an anonymiser like HideMyAss...
User avatar
Portland
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8828
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 8:16 am 0
Location: Swinton, South Yorkshire

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by Portland »

Conclusion

For the reasons set out above, I conclude that both users and the operators of TPB infringe the copyrights of the Claimants (and those they represent) in the UK.



Anonymiser much? I don't robberjize stuff, but to think that TPB is te only source of torrent seeds is laughable. Are the record companies going to try to kill IRC, usenet and any site with the word torrent, seed, leech or the like too?

<edit. just seen techno's post - lol>
Portland 3.0.1.0 public release rolled out
User avatar
RedOktober
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4788
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:15 pm 0
Location: Stalin's Organ
Contact:

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by RedOktober »

First all torrent sites, then all porn sites.

Simples.
Sponsoring terrorism at £1 per mile.
User avatar
Istar
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4869
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:42 pm 0
Location: London, UK.

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by Istar »

Portland wrote:Are the record companies going to try to kill IRC, usenet and any site with the word torrent, seed, leech or the like too?
Now you are beginning to understand, Grasshopper.
llamaprotector
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 648
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:00 am 0

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by llamaprotector »

Well I can't get the whole story in the title!

Well TPB is the best IMO (and why not seeing as one of the founders was from TRSI crew back in the Amiga days :lol: )

But we lost 3 of the larger file sharing sites already so TPB too would be annoying. And it just opens the door to censoring the net.....which the FBI conveniently do for all of us a la megaupload.

VPN tunnelling FTW of course ;)

Ah well when huge ISPs start going under you know who to blame.....yes those greedy media dinosaurs peddling their talentless music ad infinitum eh ;)
User avatar
Iain
Baaa!
Baaa!
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 9:55 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: iainmc0
Location: Banbury UK
Contact:

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by Iain »

Ixquick seach engine.
It has a 'view this site through our proxy' link for each result. TPB's search doesn't work through the proxy, but TPB's search is not so good anyway. And you can't usually view the 2nd+ page of TPB search results due to a bug in ixquick. But you can get the magnet uri's and .torrent files.
So the problem is already solved.
User avatar
zip accident
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13928
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:58 pm 0
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by zip accident »

Then they go after the anonymisers.

Censorship is coming.
"My way is the way of not fighting":- the book of Enter the Dragon.
User avatar
guythp
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 11:49 pm 0
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk

Re: Judge rules all UK ISPs now required to block Piratebay

Post by guythp »

zip accident wrote:Then they go after the anonymisers.

Censorship is coming.
Bukkake style?
the hairy pies
User avatar
ElfQrin
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4384
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 12:55 pm 0
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb

Post by ElfQrin »

The Pirate Bay is blocked in Italy since 2008 (DNS) and 2010 (IP).

The more they censor the Web, the more the anonymous Internet grows, with projects like Tor Project: Vidalia and Freenet's groups.
And then there'll be little they could do about it.
User avatar
zip accident
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13928
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:58 pm 0
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb

Post by zip accident »

ElfQrin wrote:The more they censor the Web, the more the anonymous Internet grows, with projects like Tor Project: Vidalia and Freenet's groups.
And then there'll be little they could do about it.
They could make connecting to those an offence.

I'm not in favour of censorship, but it does seem to be coming.
"My way is the way of not fighting":- the book of Enter the Dragon.
User avatar
Truder
Baaaa!
Baaaa!
Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:32 pm 0
PSN: theonlyintruder
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb

Post by Truder »

And when does censorship become surveillance and when does surveillance becomes invasion of privacy?
User avatar
Darkflame
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 18236
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 11:06 am 0
Location: Not the UK

Re: Judge doesn't rule UK ISPs now required to block Pirateb

Post by Darkflame »

Thats easy, censorship is passive, surveillance is active.
Or, in computing terms, censorship would be blocking the event before it happens, surveillance would be monitoring and going after you later for doing so.

Arguably one causes the other when something is impossible to police and stop in all case's so monitoring and checking is needed instead. (ie, prosecuting a shop for saling something they shouldn't).

With ISPs though there is no excuse for surveillance - they could easily block IPs getting to their servers without looking at who's asking for them, let alone keep records of them.
Post Reply