Politics Thread!
Re: Politics Thread!
Like in Scotland? 
-
The ghost of raids past
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:38 pm 0
Re: Politics Thread!
The Scottish result means the West Lothian problem has to be solved. The Uk cannot be held to ransom by 1.4 million voters.
- Absolute_Zero
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 3564
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:11 pm 0
- Location: Hilbert Hotel, Heisenberg.
Re: Politics Thread!
No, in the UK as a whole.gravy wrote:Like in Scotland?
The Labour party in Scotland might need to devolve to an SDLP-like arrangement.
-
The ghost of raids past
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:38 pm 0
- pogo
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14180
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 8:28 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: BrassSparrow
- Location: County Durham
Re: Politics Thread!
AS I noted earlier I think this result makes a strong case for further devolution. Problem is it’s unlikely to be devolution the SNP likes. They already have tax raising, spending and borrowing powers. Next step would be full fiscal autonomy, i.e. the scrapping of the Barnett formula, so Scotland takes responsibility for balancing the books on their own, as they would need to for independence. The problem is that would leave a large hole to be filled, with higher taxes or lower spending, so might be a step towards independence too far for the SNP.
The other sort of devolution needed is yes, to answer the West Lothian question, and find some way of giving English MPs exclusive say over legislation affecting only England. How to do that though is far from obvious. Again this is unlikely to be liked by the SNP as it would greatly reduce their relevance at Westminster (assuming it is still the parliament of England and not some new body). But something needs to be done.
The other sort of devolution needed is yes, to answer the West Lothian question, and find some way of giving English MPs exclusive say over legislation affecting only England. How to do that though is far from obvious. Again this is unlikely to be liked by the SNP as it would greatly reduce their relevance at Westminster (assuming it is still the parliament of England and not some new body). But something needs to be done.
-
offyoutoddle
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:16 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: awvc1@yahoo.co.uk
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Politics Thread!
Remarkable. One of the few occasions I can think of that he was right about anything. I'd say nice things about him, but then that would make me a bigger 2 faced liar than him.Absolute_Zero wrote:T. Blair called it in January... an election “in which a traditional left-wing party competes with a traditional right-wing party, with the traditional result”.
one joy scatters a thousand griefs
Re: Politics Thread!
You are Enoch Powell AICMFPThe ghost of raids past wrote:The Scottish result means the West Lothian problem has to be solved. The Uk cannot be held to ransom by 1.4 million voters.
"Rivers of Porridge"
"massive retard™", "full of shit™", "tiny bitch™", "retarted™", "a bit of a one trick pony™", "petty™", "simple minded idealistic twat™", "miserable humourless fucker™"
-
The ghost of raids past
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1682
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:38 pm 0
Re: Politics Thread!
Hardly, its simply not acceptable for a country with its own parliment to vote on matters that only affect England, Wales and Nortthern Ireland. Devolution cuts both ways. Not sure what AICMFP means.tufty wrote:You are Enoch Powell AICMFPThe ghost of raids past wrote:The Scottish result means the West Lothian problem has to be solved. The Uk cannot be held to ransom by 1.4 million voters.
"Rivers of Porridge"
- pogo
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14180
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 8:28 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: BrassSparrow
- Location: County Durham
Re: Politics Thread!
Worth considering what the result would be under PR. Here are the final vote percentages of the main parties, from the BBC.
CON 36.9
LAB 30.4
UKIP 12.6
LD 7.9
SNP 4.7
GRN 3.8
But with STV you only get elected if your share of the vote is large enough, based on the size of the constituency. With e.g. similarly sized constituencies to the European parliament the SNP, Greens and Lib Dems (and others) would get nothing, while UKIP would get maybe a handful of seats. The Conservatives and Labour would take almost all seats, and the Tories would have a large majority.
Of course that ignores the effect of geographic location. You would expect the SNP to do better in Scottish seats. But with 50% of the vote they would only have half not almost all the MPs.
Basically under PR, with the Conservatives and UKIP getting close to 50% of the vote and most parties getting too few votes to qualify under common PR systems, it would be either a Tory majority or a Tory-UKIP coalition.
CON 36.9
LAB 30.4
UKIP 12.6
LD 7.9
SNP 4.7
GRN 3.8
But with STV you only get elected if your share of the vote is large enough, based on the size of the constituency. With e.g. similarly sized constituencies to the European parliament the SNP, Greens and Lib Dems (and others) would get nothing, while UKIP would get maybe a handful of seats. The Conservatives and Labour would take almost all seats, and the Tories would have a large majority.
Of course that ignores the effect of geographic location. You would expect the SNP to do better in Scottish seats. But with 50% of the vote they would only have half not almost all the MPs.
Basically under PR, with the Conservatives and UKIP getting close to 50% of the vote and most parties getting too few votes to qualify under common PR systems, it would be either a Tory majority or a Tory-UKIP coalition.
Re: Politics Thread!
Wow, for a moment there I thought Brand actually stood for something! Thought it was unusual, but still caught hook line and sinker. Won't be falling for that one again
The thing is that means I get to type the words "Cameron was right" - he's a joke.
The thing is that means I get to type the words "Cameron was right" - he's a joke.
-
offyoutoddle
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2644
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:16 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: awvc1@yahoo.co.uk
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Politics Thread!
"At great potential cost to his integrity,Brand surprised his fans and commentators by backing Miliband and urging the electorate to vote for Labour, "
well, in reading that one sentence, it is the first time this prick has made me laugh.
one joy scatters a thousand griefs
Re: Politics Thread!
Yes, nice hatchet job there by Grierson.
"Russell Brand stages climbdown on support for Ed Miliband"
In the accompanying video he does no such thing.
Trippy vibes...
http://soundcloud.com/two-gapper
http://soundcloud.com/two-gapper
Re: Politics Thread!
Trippy vibes...
http://soundcloud.com/two-gapper
http://soundcloud.com/two-gapper
Re: Politics Thread!
Actually, you're right. I didn't bother to actually watch the video. My bad...(o)(o) wrote:Yes, nice hatchet job there by Grierson.
"Russell Brand stages climbdown on support for Ed Miliband"
In the accompanying video he does no such thing.
He says what I was thinking actually, they're going to shit on the poor, the sick, etc so now is definitely going to be the time to build up the charitable causes.
Personally, having read through some of the Reddit stuff I posted on disability (which affects one of my friends) I actually think the Citizen's Advice Bureau is a good place to support.

