We don’t know that. The Falklands War was only one factor. The Tories were unpopular before the war but we were in a recession which had started to recover by the election. the Labour party did move sharply to the left, inspiring the SNP to break away and form a new party, before the Falklands War. The Tories got 4.5m more votes than Labour, who themselves were only 700,000 ahead of the Lib+SNP alliance.zip accident wrote:Yeah, but Thatcher would have lost too.
That war was worth something like 30% of the vote to the party in power. If it had been Labour or the SDP–Liberal Alliance, you wouldn't have seen them shifted for ten years either.
If Labour had not split they might have been able to win. But the fact is they did split, along similar fault lines that divide the party today, between “Blairites” and those who consider them a “virus”. That had nothing to do with the Falklands, just Labour self-destructing over the same divisions as today.






