RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)

Post by **RiK** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:25 pm 0

(o)(o) wrote:I am unable to see any with boobies out.
She's not a prude I hope!

She's far from a prude, but that has no bearing on what level she's happy for *you* to see..

(o)(o) · Post by **(o)(o)** » Thu Aug 20, 2015 7:40 pm 0

RiK wrote:
(o)(o) wrote:I am unable to see any with boobies out.
She's not a prude I hope!
She's far from a prude, but that has no bearing on what level she's happy for *you* to see..

That could well be "everything" then!

I can do any Thursday afternoon..

Post by **RiK** » Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:07 pm 0

jezebelle-bristol-638 by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Say hello to Emily...

Post by **RiK** » Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:13 pm 0

jezebelle-bristol-641 by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

toxibunny · Post by **toxibunny** » Sat Sep 19, 2015 7:20 am 0

Interesting eye colour.

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:56 am 0

What lies beneath? by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Never let it be said I don't take my models to all the most glamorous locations. At this point we were about 1/2 mile underground..

venusian · Post by **venusian** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:13 am 0

Rik, please don't take this as a criticism - it's meant absolutely in a sense of inquiry and I'm genuinely interested in the answer rather than trying to say something about it myself...

Why put a nude woman in a mucky old tunnel?

I original wrote a load a "is it this?", "is it that?" stuff but they all ended up looking like leading questions so I deleted them. I can see that it's a technically excellent photograph; it's not a question of quality.

Misfit · Post by **Misfit** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:21 am 0

venusian wrote: Why put a nude woman in a mucky old tunnel?

It's where he keeps his 'models' between shoots?

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:23 am 0

venusian wrote:Why put a nude woman in a mucky old tunnel?

The very fact you've asked that question means it worked.

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:43 am 0

... same reason I put one in an old ruined castle..

Untitled by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:50 am 0

.. or in a boat in the middle of the woods..

Unchained by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 11:59 am 0

Misfit wrote:Wow. I'm not one who understand why someone who looks like that needs the body art, but I could probably get over it in this case!

Pffft.. that's nothing compared to my lovely friend Anna..

Anna Quinn by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Shot for the London Tattoo Convention 2015
This one was used inside the front cover of Zoo Magazine, September 2015.

See:

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:01 pm 0

Another one of Anna from the same shoot:

20150526-anna-quinn-0222 by Richard Olpin, on Flickr

Misfit · Post by **Misfit** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:41 pm 0

I think you've shown us Anna before or I've just browsed your Flickr and may have paused for a moment or two.

Still don't get it, they are quite stunning enough untouched. But it's better art, thus more attractive on Anna...

Post by **RiK** » Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:01 pm 0

I'm not really into tattoos myself, mostly because they look shite when they fade, but I totally respect a persons freedom of choice to have them.

I'd rather see someone without extensive body art or piercings personally, but they don't bother me either way photographically.

YakYak

RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)

Re: RiK's random people shots..

Re: RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)

Re: RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)

Re: RiK's random people shots.. (Some NSFW)