zip accident wrote:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/11/freeman_dyson_interview/
Poor old Dyson appears to believe there's a place in the world for pure, apolitical scientific discourse.
So out of touch!
Might be the fault of the interviewer, but I do find it hard to understand what he is saying there at times.
For example, at the end when talking about fusion he says for the last 50 years we have been doing big engineering projects rather then science.
It would be nice to know details here - why doesn't he see those projects as science? what non-engineering science on fusion is he wanting funding instead ?
Darkflame wrote:For example, at the end when talking about fusion he says for the last 50 years we have been doing big engineering projects rather then science.
It would be nice to know details here - why doesn't he see those projects as science? what non-engineering science on fusion is he wanting funding instead ?
I think he means that fusion turned from science to engineering when people started bashing at atoms with a spanner trying to turn them into money. Science would be bashing atoms with a spanner just to see what happens.
Elon Musk, 20 Nov on Twitter wrote:We are looking for hardcore software engineers. No prior experience with cars required. Please include code sample or link to your work.
Oh go on then coders, you get to be a rocket scientist.
I would like to think that software engineers in the automotive industry are the very worst in the world; because I can't bear the thought of anybody finding a way of producing worse code that what I've seen there. I totally get why he would want to filter out their kind.
On the other hand I wouldn't fancy driving a car with software duct-trapped together with Python, either.
New Horizons clearly just pointed its camera at Pluto as it went past to capture whatever was under it, and came up trumps with the varied terrain it captured. Frustratingly that is probably it for photos of these things. With no plans to return to Pluto any time soon this is the closest look at it we will get in many if not most of our lifetimes.
"debate rages inside and outside of NASA about what happens in low-Earth orbit in 2024, or 2028 at the latest, when the space agency stops supporting the space station. The most likely outcome is that the station will be safely deorbited, break apart in the atmosphere, and fall into the Pacific Ocean."
"Oh dear lord, I slightly soiled myself. Oxfam won’t be pleased."