Trump

[gumboot]

Now that the sexy chat scandal has blown over it looks like Trump is back in the lead.

Great. We now know the attention span of the typical Trump supporter. The next scandal can be scheduled accordingly.

[gravy]

Now that the sexy chat scandal has blown over it looks like Trump is back in the lead.

"Back"? He's basically never been in the lead.

And is now further away than ever.

Come on Snaff, what are you referencing here?

[gumboot]

I think it means Trump is declaring victory much more often now.

[Darkflame]

Spoof debate transcript;
http://waitbutwhy.com/2016/10/second-pr ... ebate.html
Quite funny and not far from accurate.

[(o)(o)]

The potential leader of the free world, folks.

How do you even do that?? Pussy is the vag from vulva back to cervix.. doesn't include Labia, Mons pubis etc there's nothing to grab ??

It would make more sense if he said hook them by the pussy, eg with Trump branded umbrella handle...

[Governmentyard]

Pussy is the vag from vulva back to cervix.. doesn't include Labia, Mons pubis etc there's nothing to grab ??

Explain the common term "shaved pussy" then...

[pogo]

some nonsense

“pussy” is a slang term for female genitalia, not a precise medical term. As for Trump’s usage, a better word would be grope of fondle. I doubt he means grab and hold on to it.

[gravy]

So glad we have a tame Alt Righter here to channel Don Don's true meaning out of the gibberish he spouts.

[F-ZeroOne]

Er...

My opinion since ~May... if it looks as though Trump might be able to win, something will magically surface in order to knock him back.

Rationale: the spooks etc, et al, don't seem at all comfortable with the notion of President Trump.

You are implying the “spooks” would work against Trump. While fact is the only spooks involved are the Russian ones hacking Democrat servers and leaking what they find via the rapist Julian Assange.

Why do Russians want Trump to win? Because they know he would be a bad president, and in Putin’s narrow-minded zero-sum world anything that’s bad for the US is good for Russia. Or there could be even deeper reasons, such as deals between Putin and Trump. Far fetched? Perhaps, but he’s got to be hiding something in his withheld tax returns, something so bad he’s prepared to take the hit from not releasing them.

http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin- ... nik-508635

[gumboot]

I thought it was a Crocodile Dundee style thing.

[pogo]

http://www.newsweek.com/vladimir-putin-sidney-blumenthal-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-benghazi-sputnik-508635

Exactly. It’s a transparent attempt by the Russians to fabricate controversy by misquoting stolen e-mails, helped by the rapist Julian Assange. Only an idiot like Trump would be taken in by it.

[(o)(o)]

Pussy is the vag from vulva back to cervix.. doesn't include Labia, Mons pubis etc there's nothing to grab ??

Explain the common term "shaved pussy" then...

You got me there.

Hangs head in shame..

[KlaxonCow]

[PFVA]

What's bad in this i the fact the election is becoming just a "tabloid" issue.

There is no discussion of economics, social policies, etc. Taking in consideration that the most powerful president in the world is being elected and the world is watching the image being created of the US is less than desirable.

[pogo]

One quote from that video, the core of Trump’s argument (never mind it’s an irrelevant one as he’s not running against Bill Clinton):

“ Bill Clinton was the wors[t] abuser of women ever to sit in the Oval Office”.

Which is wrong in a number of ways. First Bill Clinton didn’t abuse women, that we know. He slept around and messed around but there is no evidence it was anything other than consensual. Second the only reason we know so much about Bill Clinton’s indiscretions is it happened in the modern media age, and post-Watergate. Pre-Watergate these things went on but were kept quiet, there was much more deference shown to the Commander in Chief. JFK had affairs but it was hushed up. FDR was disabled and needed a wheelchair but it was hushed up.

But most compellingly of all, go back to the very first president. Washington kept slaves, as did many other presidents. And there is no way you can say what Bill Clinton did is worse than slavery. Republicans though like to ignore and minimise slavery, as to acknowledge it would mean acknowledging the legacy of it which persists today in the different circumstances of Blacks compared to all other ethnic groups.