Cloudane wrote:but I'm sure I remember learning about vaccines in school and them basically just being a very small quantity of the virus. Small enough that your immune system can figure it out and produce its own antibody, without getting overwhelmed.
It depends. But generally a vaccine is a
harmless version of the virus.
Something that'll trigger the immune system to produce the right antibodies, but which has been "de-fanged" sufficiently, so it won't cause any of the nasty potentially fatal symptoms.
I was watching a report about those working on a vaccine right now, and they were basically saying how they were trying to extract the right bits of RNA / DNA from the virus - so the immune system would identify the vaccine in the same way as the real virus and produce antibodies against it - but leaving out the nasty bits. And if they can identify what those exact bits are, then they can put them into something otherwise harmless, and that'll be the vaccine.
It's a small quantity of a
harmless version of the virus. You need it to be as close to the real virus as possible - so that the immune system identifies it and the real virus the same way and produces the right antibodies - but removing all the nastiness of the virus, so they get the immunity but without any of the downsides (or, well, as close to "harmless" / symptom-less as it's possible to get).
This is, unfortunately, why these things can take quite a while to develop, as that's a bit of a tightrope walk to get right. Particularly with a novel virus, as we're still learning what the bloody thing even is, and how it works, in the first place.
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes