.. it's going to be one of the weirdest elections in the USA history probably .. expect more riots coming and "a smegload of shit" being thrown ( figuratively ) there and there ...merman wrote:Mr and Mrs Scumbag have applied for postal votes in Florida - is that how they know there could be fraud? How much of the 0.025% of fraudulent mail-in ballots do you think Trump and his fellow Republicans have been responsible for?F-ZeroOne wrote:Reporter actually comes out and says it:
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/page/2/
Also, I should, but cannot believe hes actually bought up the whole birther thing with Kamala Harris again. And as for his stance on postal votes - yes, it will be "the most corrupt election in history", Mr. President - because of you.
Mailboxes being locked or physically removed already.
Trump
- gilesgoat
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 27258
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
- Location: Monfalcone, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Trump
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
"Baa"
Re: Trump
As a friend of mine said recently, "My tiny violin is getting a lot of playtime just now...":
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53853297
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53853297
"Stars don't twinkle in space." - Char Aznable.
Re: Trump
Incidentally, he was arrested by agents of the US Postal Inspection Service, which certainly feels like someone getting some payback.F-ZeroOne wrote:As a friend of mine said recently, "My tiny violin is getting a lot of playtime just now...":
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53853297
"Stars don't twinkle in space." - Char Aznable.
Re: Trump
So, Kellyanne Conway is on her way out. Rats and sinking ships, anyone?
"massive retard™", "full of shit™", "tiny bitch™", "retarted™", "a bit of a one trick pony™", "petty™", "simple minded idealistic twat™", "miserable humourless fucker™"
- merman
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10943
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: merman1974
- Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
- Location: Skegness, England
- Contact:
Re: Trump
To spend more time with her family. Including husband George, who just happens to be running The Lincoln Project aimed at unseating Trump.tufty wrote:So, Kellyanne Conway is on her way out. Rats and sinking ships, anyone?
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
Re: Trump
Isn't her daughter also deeply ashamed to be even of the same bloodline or something?merman wrote:To spend more time with her family. Including husband George, who just happens to be running The Lincoln Project aimed at unseating Trump.tufty wrote:So, Kellyanne Conway is on her way out. Rats and sinking ships, anyone?
"Oh dear lord, I slightly soiled myself. Oxfam won’t be pleased."
Re: Trump
Her dad is equally rabidly anti-Trump, and reportedly the 15-year-old daughter asked for "emancipation" from the two of them this weekend, and he has also left his post. So i guess it's a case of everyone getting their heads out their arses in order to look after something that's actually important in life.
Re: Trump
Also, Trump has the worst polling of any President ever at this point in the campaign.
I mean, what with Brexit and Trump getting in, in the first place, then we've all learnt to be wary of calling the outcome of a poll before it's done...
But there's the logic of leaving now, as there's nothing to gain, when he's surely going to lose. Quitting whilst one is ahead. Not getting dragged down by this shit show, for the sake of an orange man who's very likely going to lose miserably anyway.
One sucks up to these arseholes, in politics, to gain power and status - yeah, that's looking like an unlikely outcome. So fuck him.
I mean, what with Brexit and Trump getting in, in the first place, then we've all learnt to be wary of calling the outcome of a poll before it's done...
But there's the logic of leaving now, as there's nothing to gain, when he's surely going to lose. Quitting whilst one is ahead. Not getting dragged down by this shit show, for the sake of an orange man who's very likely going to lose miserably anyway.
One sucks up to these arseholes, in politics, to gain power and status - yeah, that's looking like an unlikely outcome. So fuck him.
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes
- John Maynard Keynes
- gilesgoat
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 27258
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
- Location: Monfalcone, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Trump
.. Goat will not but ... "what if he really wins again" ???KlaxonCow wrote:Also, Trump has the worst polling of any President ever at this point in the campaign.
I mean, what with Brexit and Trump getting in, in the first place, then we've all learnt to be wary of calling the outcome of a poll before it's done...
But there's the logic of leaving now, as there's nothing to gain, when he's surely going to lose. Quitting whilst one is ahead. Not getting dragged down by this shit show, for the sake of an orange man who's very likely going to lose miserably anyway.
One sucks up to these arseholes, in politics, to gain power and status - yeah, that's looking like an unlikely outcome. So fuck him.
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
"Baa"
Re: Trump
That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.gilesgoat wrote:.. Goat will not but ... "what if he really wins again" ???
And look what happened. You can read as much news as you like, that all says he's polling worse than ever, that he's said this or that lie, done this or that thing to the USPS, it doesn't matter. It's impossible to call.
"Oh dear lord, I slightly soiled myself. Oxfam won’t be pleased."
- gilesgoat
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 27258
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
- Location: Monfalcone, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Trump
You know that if he wins again he'll push really hard for the law to change so he can be re-elected "infinite times" ?Barney wrote:That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.gilesgoat wrote:.. Goat will not but ... "what if he really wins again" ???
And look what happened. You can read as much news as you like, that all says he's polling worse than ever, that he's said this or that lie, done this or that thing to the USPS, it doesn't matter. It's impossible to call.
.. then it's going to happen like in Russia/Belarus .. "always the same voting results" .. ..
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
"Baa"
- Harlequin
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6505
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
- Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.
Re: Trump
That is not how I recall things at all. Indeed, I switched my vote from LibDem to Labour to ward off the Conservative threat despite being in a Labour stronghold. Perhaps we were interacting with different chambers of Facebook (I read little on Twitter and do not use Instagram).Barney wrote:That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
Re: Trump
That's almost certainly the case. From my POV, it was the opposite - and I guess that's the danger of social media as it stands.Harlequin wrote:That is not how I recall things at all. Indeed, I switched my vote from LibDem to Labour to ward off the Conservative threat despite being in a Labour stronghold. Perhaps we were interacting with different chambers of Facebook (I read little on Twitter and do not use Instagram).Barney wrote:That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.
"Oh dear lord, I slightly soiled myself. Oxfam won’t be pleased."
- gilesgoat
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 27258
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
- Location: Monfalcone, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Trump
There are two problems at play here, 1. is that social media creates "hype" before that is verified to be true or not or not so true but partially true, 2. the fact that is really hard at times to get "the real facts" to verify the informationBarney wrote:That's almost certainly the case. From my POV, it was the opposite - and I guess that's the danger of social media as it stands.Harlequin wrote:That is not how I recall things at all. Indeed, I switched my vote from LibDem to Labour to ward off the Conservative threat despite being in a Labour stronghold. Perhaps we were interacting with different chambers of Facebook (I read little on Twitter and do not use Instagram).Barney wrote:That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
"Baa"
- Harlequin
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6505
- Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
- Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.
Re: Trump
I treat just about everything on social media as nothing more than people's opinions anyway. Plus I tend to question everything, including myself and my reactions to what I read. I get most of my news from the Grauniad (I would probably use the Torygraph as well were it not for its paywall) and Beeb sources such as its news site and its news-based panel shows.gilesgoat wrote:There are two problems at play here, 1. is that social media creates "hype" before that is verified to be true or not or not so true but partially true, 2. the fact that is really hard at times to get "the real facts" to verify the informationBarney wrote:That's almost certainly the case. From my POV, it was the opposite - and I guess that's the danger of social media as it stands.Harlequin wrote:That is not how I recall things at all. Indeed, I switched my vote from LibDem to Labour to ward off the Conservative threat despite being in a Labour stronghold. Perhaps we were interacting with different chambers of Facebook (I read little on Twitter and do not use Instagram).Barney wrote:That's a very real possibility. Before the 2019 election, everywhere you looked the Tories were dying on their arses. Labour was storming ahead in the public's eye. Twitter, FB, Insta et al were all screaming that they (the Tories) were going to be massively eliminated.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.

