Trump

[(o)(o)]

Sad stuff



Edit : She's a councilwomen and wife of the guy shown harassing a Portland based journalist at the Million MAGA March DC who was fired as a result.

[KlaxonCow]

"I hear the sound of an abundance of rain."

Is that a prayer or a weather forecast?

[tufty]

Haha, that's hilarious. I thought it was the "leftists" that were whiny crybabies who wanted "safe spaces".

"I want my mommy to come to my car and give me a hug." Fuck off.

[Foozwah]

Edit : She's a councilwomen and wife of the guy shown harassing a Portland based journalist at the Million MAGA March DC who was fired as a result.

I shouldn't take delight in the misfortune of others, but that is the funniest thing I have seen today. Chickens coming home to roost.

[Foozwah]

Okay, _that_ may be a tie for the funnest thing I've seen today.

Weird, it's almost as if all these "prophets" don't so much have a direct telephone line to "god" as have untreated mental illnesses and/or are dodgy grifters.

[merman]

And the pardons have started, with a man jailed for lying to Congress being let off. Mike Flynn, who Obama specifically warned Trump not to appoint.


(Trump did pardon Susan B Anthony posthumously for illegal voting. Of course that election was rigged against women voting at all...)

[KlaxonCow]

Trump apparently thinks that he's "the American King" and that there's some sort of rules or protocol about how you address the President:



If I was that reporter then I'd happily tell him: "fuck you, I can address you however the fuck I like - it's called the First Amendment, bitch. By all means, take me all the way to the Supreme Court, if you don't believe me... and you want to continue your miserable losing streak in the courts, you big fucking orange loser."

[(o)(o)]

This seems to be superb :

[merman]

“I’ll leave when they can’t prove my unsubstantiated claims of fraud” - very gracious from the man who spent more than a year out of the last four away from the White House, staying at his own properties while charging the expenses to the American taxpayer (and running up a huge travel and security bill too)

[snaff]

It's quite clear the election was bent. It's just up to the courts and relevant authorities to determine how much fraud took place, whether it affected the result, and what the remedy is. There's nothing anti-democratic about anyone presenting their concerns to the courts and there's no suggestion that Trump won't go along with the decision of the authorities even if he disagrees with it.

[tufty]

It's far from clear the elction was "bent".

Trump's legal team, if that is the word to use, have been very careful not to make any allegations of fraud of any type in the courtroom, despite the wild allegations they are making outside the courtroom. There's a very good reason for this, and it's to do with not wanting to get disbarred.

They have zero evidence of any wrongdoing, and precious little evidence of any sort of inconsistency. That's why their cases are being thrown out of court. And, of course, if you want to claim "activist judges" consider that the recent and somewhat amusing denial issued in Pennsylvania was made by 3 judges, two of whom were appointed by President George W Bush Jr, and one (who actually wrote the decision) appointed by President Donald J Trump.

The entire debacle was signposted ahead of the election by Trump himself, who stated that it was impossible for him to lose unless the election was fixed, and that should he lose he'd take it all to court, and consists of trying to throw enough shit against the wall that some might stick and enable him to take it to the supreme court. It's fairly clear that this is not going to work, but it might get his morons riled up enough that they start shooting people who look like they might be democrats.

Meanwhile, in Wisconsin, the Trump-triggered recount of has increased Joe Biden's lead. Whoops.

[gilesgoat]

It's quite clear the election was bent. It's just up to the courts and relevant authorities to determine how much fraud took place, whether it affected the result, and what the remedy is. There's nothing anti-democratic about anyone presenting their concerns to the courts and there's no suggestion that Trump won't go along with the decision of the authorities even if he disagrees with it.

How was it "very clear" that was bent ?

Surely "no more bent that ANY election in USA since election system in USA been created ?"

I've seen quite a few legal things .. USA is "insane" first of all they should have IMHO *ONE* method for voting/etc. NOT leave "every state to have its own rules" .. that's what you get from .. that and the "immense shit of lawyers/legal system present".

No mystery, I am NOT fond of "common law system", I don't think it's a good one I am more confident with the "civil law" system.

[Mat]

Don't feed the troll

[gilesgoat]

Don't feed the troll

I think I read/seen/listened to legal aspects of the voting system and the voting history in USA more than what he ever did in these last months

.. enough to understand that starting from the USA constituion and going over one CAN REALLY say that "the USA voting system as it is is practically legally rigged/riggable", you can do almost "all shit you want still perfectly remaining within their laws".

One thing that seems to be still "source of incredible debate in USA and gets constantly modified/pulled" is the thing if voting is a right or a privilege AND who/what can vote.

Is about the "who is allowed to vote" that "all the meddeling/fucking up comes, there's "no clear cut/definition" and varies from state to state and is "constantly under changes" that's they way "they play with numbers".

It certainly is a system that the way/intentions it's been designed is DESIGNED TO BE MANIPULATED so in a way "there's no big suprise in what T. is doing", it's just trying to stretch "the limits" of what he can do.

USA constitution basically seems to say "all men are equal" but "not all have the same rights" and always wanted "everything to be controlled by a certain small elite", it seems it's "intrinsic" in their making of the stuff that they felt the need of "a small elite in control of things", "speaking in simple terms" they really did not want a socialist state.

It's a country based on money/control since its inception and on the existance "of some control group", it's not illuminati or such, but definitely you could say "there's certainly an elite ( of rich powerful people ) behind".

I mean if look in a certain sense, the fact that "lobbying" is perfectly legal .. isn't it kinda "legalising corruption" ?

You can't trust "much" a country where "socialism" is considered to be "a bad word" ..

Rule of thumb ... BEWARE of people speaking of "empire" .. "God's will" ... "we are the best nation in the world" .. when talking about politics

Also no, as we seen the angles from Africa did not come, and the "prophets" were wrong

[tufty]

Also no, as we seen the angles from Africa did not come, and the "prophets" were wrong 8)

Blame that wall! Blame that wall!