Hitting refresh, over and over - NSFW!

Anders · Post by **Anders** » Mon May 31, 2004 12:20 pm 0

The funny thing with that picture is that everyone is surprised to see the fellow pissing fire. No one questions why he's pissing fire on THE FLOOR.

moobaa · Post by **moobaa** » Mon May 31, 2004 12:25 pm 0

Anders wrote:No one questions why he's pissing fire on THE FLOOR.

Well, if tried pissing on the roof, he'd need a fire extinguisher for his clothes, wouldn't he?

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Mon May 31, 2004 12:30 pm 0

Jamesac wrote:

It's just clicked, she's eating pussy...

moobaa · Post by **moobaa** » Mon May 31, 2004 1:21 pm 0

Spirit wrote:It's just clicked, she's eating pussy...

Hence my rather overt "I heart..." post

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Mon May 31, 2004 1:29 pm 0

moobaa wrote:
Spirit wrote:It's just clicked, she's eating pussy...
Hence my rather overt "I heart..." post

Aaaaaaah now it makes sense

Zen-Chan · Post by **Zen-Chan** » Mon May 31, 2004 1:31 pm 0

I can't get it to refresh - it just gives me the same images again. I expect this is something tedious to do with caches, can someone help? (I'm using Mozilla)

Spirit · Post by **Spirit** » Mon May 31, 2004 1:35 pm 0

It's happened before, just need to give it a bit of time for something to be fixed on the site.

Zen-Chan · Post by **Zen-Chan** » Mon May 31, 2004 1:36 pm 0

Ah, ok. Cheers

matt · Post by **matt** » Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:25 am 0

WHY JPEG COMPRESSION IS BAD

http://paperbrigade.com/features/ye%20rin%20mok/

everklear · Post by **everklear** » Tue Jun 01, 2004 5:49 am 0

matt wrote:WHY JPEG COMPRESSION IS BAD

No no, it's quite good actually. You see, that amazing picture is only about 3.5 kilobytes. If you're like me, you're saying to yourself, "wow!" right about now. It's true.

matt · Post by **matt** » Tue Jun 01, 2004 8:53 am 0

everklear wrote:
matt wrote:WHY JPEG COMPRESSION IS BAD
No no, it's quite good actually. You see, that amazing picture is only about 3.5 kilobytes. If you're like me, you're saying to yourself, "wow!" right about now. It's true.

On the page it was linked from they were showing it in the browser at about 100x100, which I guess is some sort of perverse browser aided form of resampling?

matt

oNyx · Post by **oNyx** » Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:00 pm 0

matt wrote:
everklear wrote:
matt wrote:WHY JPEG COMPRESSION IS BAD
No no, it's quite good actually. You see, that amazing picture is only about 3.5 kilobytes. If you're like me, you're saying to yourself, "wow!" right about now. It's true.
On the page it was linked from they were showing it in the browser at about 100x100, which I guess is some sort of perverse browser aided form of resampling?

matt

Dunno if there are browsers wich actually resample... all I know just rescale.

Anders · Post by **Anders** » Wed Jun 02, 2004 10:15 am 0

Thank God it's working again.

He's not looking at her neck, is he?

Hmm, Ice Man Yak... Is there something you're not telling us, Jeff?

grue · Post by **grue** » Wed Jun 02, 2004 11:02 am 0

Wolf2010 · Post by **Wolf2010** » Wed Jun 02, 2004 4:04 pm 0

What we can't see is Moobaa off the right of the image

Ahhhhh she is showing off her pussy

I investigated this a little more, there are loads of these sort of images at http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=38089