Election Poll: Round 2

Every now and then a Llamasoftie will say something interesting. Honestly! This is where we will keep these topics so that they don't get deleted.

Who floats your vote?

Conservative Party
17
13%
Labour Party
12
9%
Liberal Democrat Party
68
51%
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
No votes
Democratic Unionist Party
15
11%
Green Party
5
4%
Plaid Cymru
3
2%
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
No votes
Sinn Fein
0
No votes
Scottish National Party
0
No votes
Scottish Socialist Party
0
No votes
UK Independence Party
0
No votes
Ulster Unionist Party
0
No votes
Veritas
2
1%
British National Party
1
1%
Respect Coalition
1
1%
Monster Raving Loony
4
3%
Other
1
1%
Abstain
5
4%
 
Total votes: 134

User avatar
aureole
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7150
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:35 pm 0

Post by aureole »

Acronym wrote: They do a pretty good job of breaking down party policy - the candidates in Cambridge are all exceptionally lucid people. I was very impressed, even when I was having to stifle the urge to scream *but that's total bollocks!* at them (which happened with each of them at least once, mainly because I'm an opinionated bugger.)
I wish I was able to vote in the Cambridge City ward since I have a clear-cut opinion on most issues there (the personal and marked dislike for Anne Cambell and the MGB project make it a lot easier to tactically vote).
User avatar
Firefox
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11412
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2002 6:15 pm 0
Location: Sheffield

Post by Firefox »

Ozzy Osbourne for president! 8)
User avatar
Jedburgh
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 5904
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:50 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: dariusjedburgh23
Location: Uncanny Valley

Post by Jedburgh »

The Lib Dems came fucking close to losing my vote by coming and ringing my doorbell at 7.30 on Saturday evening, right in the middle of Doctor Who.

Granted, I was sleeping off the effects of Friday night and not actually watching Doctor Who, and I didn't bother answering the door anyway, but still. It's the principle of the thing!
Jedburgh

It's all about trying to work out what the fuck is going on.
User avatar
Ratsoap
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6344
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 1:46 pm 0
Location: Back in Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by Ratsoap »

My vote has switched from SSP to libdem. I think voting socialist in a general election is a wasted vote. Libdems have a few policies that I really agree with, and some interesting ideas (like encouraging immigrants to come to the north isles to combat depopulation).

But I'm voting in the safest libdem seat there is so I doubt it will make a difference however I vote. :roll:
Because fucking marketing cunts would never call a spade anything other than a Deluxe Easi-Shift Earth Movement Solution.
User avatar
aureole
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7150
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:35 pm 0

Post by aureole »

So which parties have yet to offer a Party Political Broadcast? The threshold is 110 seats this time round?
User avatar
Tmuk
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7598
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 11:42 am 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Tmuk »

I'm sticking with the Tories. Was horrified to hear of Prescott's plans to flatten 400,000 victorian houses in the north of England over the next 15 years at a cost of £17,000 per demolition. Insane.
User avatar
Kemper_Boyd
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11967
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0

Post by Kemper_Boyd »

What really interests me about the results so far is not
the enormous lead by the Lib Dems but the 1% that
Labour has. Yet they lead the polls in the 'real world'.
This suggests that your average llamasoftie is very
different politically to the norm. :)

I won't turn this into a pensions topic, but yes we (well
those of us from our 20s to 40s) are fucked.

I also agree with the comments about Ken Clarke and the
socially liberal fiscally conservative POV. One good thing
to come out of the likely third lanslide for Labour is that the
Tory party might at long last implode and a real alternative
arise to replace it.
User avatar
sty
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 2:03 pm 0
Location: Darfield, New Sheepland

Post by sty »

Kemper_Boyd wrote:What really interests me about the results so far is not
the enormous lead by the Lib Dems but the 1% that
Labour has. Yet they lead the polls in the 'real world'.
This suggests that your average llamasoftie is very
different politically to the norm. :)
It was interesting that the BBC were making a similar point on the news at 10 last night.

What they were basically saying is that the opinion polls were showing Labour with a clear lead (a new poll yesterday actually gave Labour a 10 point lead), whereas everything they were hearing on their tour around the UK, and in other conversations with real people just wasn't backing up the polls!

So it all sounds rather interesting to me.

Much as it hurts me to say this, I can see Labour getting in for a third term, and I pray to Goat that I'm not sat here posting "told you so" in 4 years time.
XBoxlive -> Mr Sty
User avatar
aureole
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7150
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:35 pm 0

Post by aureole »

In Cambridge it's 50:1 in favour of LibDem signs at the moment. Odd, really.
User avatar
Kemper_Boyd
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11967
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0

Post by Kemper_Boyd »

aureole wrote:In Cambridge it's 50:1 in favour of LibDem signs at the moment. Odd, really.
It's a bit like 1987 when nobody voted Tory and yet they won again. ;)
User avatar
aureole
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7150
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 12:35 pm 0

Post by aureole »

Oh, absolutely. Polling before an election usually underestimates the current holder - there's a non-trivial swing to the status quo usually.
User avatar
merman
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10943
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: merman1974
Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
Location: Skegness, England
Contact:

Post by merman »

aureole wrote:In Cambridge it's 50:1 in favour of LibDem signs at the moment. Odd, really.
I'd noticed that too. I've also noticed the fact that none of the candidates can be arsed to come and canvass in this ward, despite the very low turnouts here at recent elections...
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
User avatar
Tmuk
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7598
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 11:42 am 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Tmuk »

merman wrote:
aureole wrote:In Cambridge it's 50:1 in favour of LibDem signs at the moment. Odd, really.
I'd noticed that too. I've also noticed the fact that none of the candidates can be arsed to come and canvass in this ward, despite the very low turnouts here at recent elections...
You mean because of the very low turnouts...
User avatar
venusian
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6651
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 2:22 pm 0
Location: South Gloucestershire

Post by venusian »

merman wrote:
aureole wrote:In Cambridge it's 50:1 in favour of LibDem signs at the moment. Odd, really.
I'd noticed that too. I've also noticed the fact that none of the candidates can be arsed to come and canvass in this ward, despite the very low turnouts here at recent elections...
Have you previously responded with a definitive answer to phone or doorstep canvassing?

The parties don't tend to to canvass every house, only the ones they want to go out and vote. Canvassing is about finding out who your supporters are and giving them a go-out-and-vote prod; it's not about persuasion. If you're on (for example) the Labour and LibDem lists as a hard Tory, they won't bother calling on you, and this time around the Tories are concentrating on phone canvassing rather than doorstepping (because they can pay other people to do it for them).

Or perhaps your house smells?
User avatar
GeeZa
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7156
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 5:04 pm 0
Location: Taghazout.

Post by GeeZa »

Nice poll Jed!

This year's election is fascinating for a number of reasons. The idea that it's a dull one this year isn't true, indeed psephologists are intruiged by how this one will turn out given the ambiguity of all the Parties involved. :D

I'm a life-long Labour supporter, am in favour of generally high-taxation, investment in public infrastructure, and a free market. It probably makes me a classic Social Democratic in the German sense of the concept. I could vote Tory if they got rid of Davis, Howard, Redwood, Letwin, Yeo, and just about everyone else. :? Their lurch to the right has been quite amusing imo and I find them less palatable as an option than I did under Thatch or Major.

So I find myself also unable to vote Labour for the first time in my life. Why? Iraq. Pure and simple. Like the Spanish after the Madrid bomb, I don't like being lied to. It's not even the decision for me, it's the attempt at confusing and obfuscation towards the populace at large. When I saw Powell's PowerPoint presentation to the Security Council the alarm bells rang hard and loud. No wonder he went. I knew then Blair had got us into something he didn't understand. The deliberate manipulation of press releases and media coverage to portray a ficticious scenario in order to justify a political imperative. F**k them. Here's another weak vote for the Lib Dems and jolly good luck to them all.

I *still* don't see anyone doing anything for the poor (the recent Sutton Trust-funded research into social mobility almost made me cry), anyone prepared to raise taxes to give us services we want (instead of pretending it's all great), and anyone addressing how the hell my generation is going to survive when we're 70. So like sty, I'm leaving the UK, essentially for good, as it's my only option and an opportunity to get out of this mess. I'm going to enjoy flying out of Heathrow when Tony takes office, sweeet.
"Chrome plated stars on a black leather sky"
Locked