OMG i had no idea!!! (Atari LYNX related)
-
Kronos
OMG i had no idea!!! (Atari LYNX related)
I though Commodore=mother of all fuckups by wasting the Amiga 1000A which any other company would have become the next IBM if they werent as stupid as Commodore but...
the LYNX or Epyx handy was built a year later and it had SNES still sprite scalling ETC!! jesus christ if Atari had launched that in 87 there would be no gameboy no way...wot a bunch of total noobs!!
the LYNX or Epyx handy was built a year later and it had SNES still sprite scalling ETC!! jesus christ if Atari had launched that in 87 there would be no gameboy no way...wot a bunch of total noobs!!
Re: OMG i had no idea!!! (Atari LYNX related)
If it launched in 87 the batteries would die by pressing POWEROld_but_still_a_kid wrote:I though Commodore=mother of all fuckups by wasting the Amiga 1000A which any other company would have become the next IBM if they werent as stupid as Commodore but...
the LYNX or Epyx handy was built a year later and it had SNES still sprite scalling ETC!! jesus christ if Atari had launched that in 87 there would be no gameboy no way...wot a bunch of total noobs!!
Armed with a Cintiq+4+bless I'm off to fight bad taste!
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
- Space Cowboy
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2837
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 7:17 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: space_covvboy
- Contact:
Re: OMG i had no idea!!! (Atari LYNX related)
I dunno, Acorn squandering their technical lead with the Archimedes strikes me as a pretty major fuck up.Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:I though Commodore=mother of all fuckups by wasting the Amiga 1000A which any other company would have become the next IBM if they werent as stupid as Commodore but...
-
Kronos
lynx was the size it was because they used a focus group to find out what size to make it, remember there were no handheld consoles in 1986/7!!
battery life etc was down to atari to solve not the original designers who were screwed out of their machine when epyx was desperate for cash.
and the original gameboy was a complete pile of shit and the same size as a gamegear more or less
so nerr!!
battery life etc was down to atari to solve not the original designers who were screwed out of their machine when epyx was desperate for cash.
and the original gameboy was a complete pile of shit and the same size as a gamegear more or less
- corrosive
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 11:25 am 0
- XBL Gamertag: Corrosive
- PSN: Corroded
- Location: Newark
It all looks so easy from here, doesn't it? 
I really doubt the battery problem could have been solved so easily as you seem to think, especially if they'd launched in 86/87 - have you gone and found what battery technology was used in 86/87? How much was the power drain on the Lynx?.
And I really don't think the Amiga would have beaten IBM; it wasn't really the sort of machine most businesses wanted back then.
I really doubt the battery problem could have been solved so easily as you seem to think, especially if they'd launched in 86/87 - have you gone and found what battery technology was used in 86/87? How much was the power drain on the Lynx?.
And I really don't think the Amiga would have beaten IBM; it wasn't really the sort of machine most businesses wanted back then.
XBL : Corrosive | PSN : Corroded
- romanista
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 2:55 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: ricklindeman@yahoo.com
- Location: United Provinces
- Contact:
micromachines on the gameboy had this too!leekfiend wrote:But the Game Gear has "two players on one Game Gear" Micro Machines, and, as such, wins the Internet and is best of all the handhelds.Dio wrote:Same problem with Game Gear.
[url=http://www.macretro.ricklindeman,nl]Retrogames on the Mac[/url]-Friendcodes-Flickr
Hmm... just think "Atari 7800".
Atari had actually 2 options in 84-85: Release the quite powerful 7800 or licence the Famicom. They scrapped the Nintendo deal and shelved the 7800 till 87-something. Now that's what I call stupid.
Tramiel-stupid. CBM never recovered from the spirit of stupidness their founder injected into that company.
But then Nintendo scrapped a deal with Sony about a CD-add-on themselves. That thing became the PS1. Oh well...
Atari had actually 2 options in 84-85: Release the quite powerful 7800 or licence the Famicom. They scrapped the Nintendo deal and shelved the 7800 till 87-something. Now that's what I call stupid.
Tramiel-stupid. CBM never recovered from the spirit of stupidness their founder injected into that company.
But then Nintendo scrapped a deal with Sony about a CD-add-on themselves. That thing became the PS1. Oh well...
Re: OMG i had no idea!!! (Atari LYNX related)
Yes, and they're complete nobodies now.Space Cowboy wrote:I dunno, Acorn squandering their technical lead with the Archimedes strikes me as a pretty major fuck up.
Potts
The language and concepts contained herein are guaranteed not to cause eternal torment in the place where the guy with the horns and pointed stick conducts his business. - Zappa
The language and concepts contained herein are guaranteed not to cause eternal torment in the place where the guy with the horns and pointed stick conducts his business. - Zappa
- Baboonanza
- Baaa!

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:31 pm 0
- Location: Arse-end of nowhere
Yeah, because the MagaCD was a real triumph wasn't it?skab wrote:But then Nintendo scrapped a deal with Sony about a CD-add-on themselves. That thing became the PS1. Oh well...




