Matrix wrote:Dude, ive been to Liverpool, and believe me, Liverpool under 20ft of water would be a hell of an improvement - plus it would get a long needed wash
Fuck me! I agree with Matrix!
Matrix wrote:Netherlands, under sea level too Cripes.... and you're a lot closer to the ice caps too...... not good. Bonkers is relative really, I have serious concerns for people who chose to live below sea level - it's not like theres a lack of "above" sea level land is it ?
The Netherlands is not the only place below sea level, take a look at the fens (where I'm originally from). About 15 miles from where I was born is "Ramsey Forty Foot", which is, yes, forty feet below sea level. That's about 13m for those in euro-land.
So _why_ would people choose to live in such an area? It's extremely fucking good farming land, basically. When the UK was an industrial / agricultural split country, places like the fens meant that people in the cities could eat. It's less important now, but still a major production area.
Basically, yes, there is a lack of productive 'above sea level' land.
And New Orleans was placed where it is/was for strategic and financial reasons - controlling the entrance to a major river - as explained earlier in the thread.
Why do people live there? - Have a job in the city, or starve in the countryside.
Simon