I was wondering something very similar today too, in that seeing as the Doc is such a scientific genius and can alter Roses's mobile phone to work across Space and stuff, you'd think he'd have been clued up enough to have a "remote control" device for the TARDIS to save him having to walk back to it every time...WiteWulf wrote:IIRC, Patrick Troughton used to have a little metal whistle that he could blow on and the TARDIS would materialise nearby.Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Well the way it's been written lately im guessing he will have a remote control he forgot about, goes "oh look my remote" *presses button* and tardis re-appears next to him
Can one of the Who geeks confirm this?
The Dr Who thread
- Sir_LANs-a-lot
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 12143
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 1:00 am 0
- Location: Here
[Sir_LANs-a-lot]
Meat is murder.
Tasty, tasty murder.
Meat is murder.
Tasty, tasty murder.
Couldn't agree more. I dunno, these smart-arse Time Lords really don't have a clue do they?Sir_LANs-a-lot wrote: I was wondering something very similar today too, in that seeing as the Doc is such a scientific genius and can alter Roses's mobile phone to work across Space and stuff, you'd think he'd have been clued up enough to have a "remote control" device for the TARDIS to save him having to walk back to it every time...
Na, the TARDIS had (or use to have) an automatic relocation circuit which when the TARDIS was in imment danger it would automatically dematerialise and materialise in a safer location within it's own time and space frame.moosedude wrote: Ten quid says the tardis is lost forever down the hole and just at the last minute a future version of the doctor who is just about to die travels back in time to give them the tardis
Well according to Troughton's (i think) doctor
GamerTag: Peltazoid - Playing Fable 2 - Trying to Play: Gears of War
Wasn't it once buried in lava with Troughton's doctor?Peltazoid wrote:Na, the TARDIS had (or use to have) an automatic relocation circuit which when the TARDIS was in imment danger it would automatically dematerialise and materialise in a safer location within it's own time and space frame.moosedude wrote: Ten quid says the tardis is lost forever down the hole and just at the last minute a future version of the doctor who is just about to die travels back in time to give them the tardis
Well according to Troughton's (i think) doctor
I'm also wondering how much the thing is supposed to weigh - for example, in The Robots of Death it materialises inside the scoop and is lifted out of there to another location. However, in Parting of the Ways we have the instance where Rose tries to yank the console open with a tow-truck and the Tardis doesn't bunch a millimetre. Or maybe the Tardis 'decides' if it's immobile or not?
Or is this getting a tad too anal?
- Stuart B
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 2720
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:14 am 0
- Location: Deepest, darkest Cambridgeshire, UK
- Contact:
Ahh, but you're not differentiating between the outside and the inside of the TARDIS though.. I have a sneaking suspicion that the exterior shell is simply a gateway to a completely different (or at least slightly offset) set of dimensions that the TARDIS occupies.
Flickr Photostream | 500px Portfolio
"We deduce he was killed by a high speed avian projectile to the face."
"Break the murder weapon and make a wish!"
"We deduce he was killed by a high speed avian projectile to the face."
"Break the murder weapon and make a wish!"
- WiteWulf
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10125
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:20 am 0
- PSN: WiteWulf
- Location: Loughborough(ish)
I believe the technical version of this is that the TARDIS is temporally, and spatially, transcendental.Stuart B wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that the exterior shell is simply a gateway to a completely different (or at least slightly offset) set of dimensions that the TARDIS occupies.
I can't remember the TARDIS ever being moved by some external force.
But hey, it's all relative, innit?
:::G:::
PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
You've never seen The Robots of Death then? Sacrilege!WiteWulf wrote:I believe the technical version of this is that the TARDIS is temporally, and spatially, transcendental.Stuart B wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that the exterior shell is simply a gateway to a completely different (or at least slightly offset) set of dimensions that the TARDIS occupies.
I can't remember the TARDIS ever being moved by some external force.
But hey, it's all relative, innit?
And it was picked up and carried in Logopolis...IronGiant wrote:You've never seen The Robots of Death then? Sacrilege!WiteWulf wrote:I believe the technical version of this is that the TARDIS is temporally, and spatially, transcendental.Stuart B wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that the exterior shell is simply a gateway to a completely different (or at least slightly offset) set of dimensions that the TARDIS occupies.
I can't remember the TARDIS ever being moved by some external force.
But hey, it's all relative, innit?
"I am a very considerate person. If I want to go out all night on my miniature golf course and shoot lizards, well, no reason to keep the neighbours awake..."
That's always the way I looked at it.Stuart B wrote:Ahh, but you're not differentiating between the outside and the inside of the TARDIS though.. I have a sneaking suspicion that the exterior shell is simply a gateway to a completely different (or at least slightly offset) set of dimensions that the TARDIS occupies.
It is a spacetime manipulation device, after all, which is how it travels anywhere.
This also neatly explains all of the TARDIS' attributes.
It's bigger on the inside than the outside because the inside isn't really in the same spacetime as the outside. If you think of the TARDIS as a portal - as if walking through the door is like walking through a wormhole - then the inside of it resides in its own separate dimension.
It "travels" through spacetime by reconnecting the wormhole to different places (hence, the wormhole in the start credits).
It is effectively indestructible externally because, in a sense, it isn't really there - it's in its own dimension - so no physical force can actually reach it unless it allows it through the "wormhole".
It's able to change shape (though this is disabled on the Doctor's TARDIS) because, you know, it's not really an object. It's a "portal" that projects a superficial appareance of an object.
Weapons don't work inside the TARDIS because it "owns" its own spacetime and can control it totally.
Similarly, it isn't really there - it always resides in its own dimension - but can link the other end of the "wormhole" to a particular time and place. Therefore, you know, it is "behaving" as an object but it actually isn't really a true physical object at all.
This is why it can sometimes be immovable and sometimes moveable: Technically, it's immovable and indestructible because it isn't even really there. But it "mimics" a real physical object for the purposes of "disguise" and practicality - being able to walk into it normally and have a door to open and close it. This is just simply the easiest "interface" to employ for the portal to make it appear and behave no different to a physical object.
Mind you, I'm making all this up. This probably isn't the "official" explanation but I like the idea because, as I say, it does kind of explain everything neatly and the idea of wormholes is actually real physics. Plus, I mean, what is it that we're seeing in the start credits? Looks like a "wormhole" to me.
Plus, if you imagine that really the TARDIS is a "spacetime manipulation device" - creates wormholes and creates distortions of spacetime to create its "own universe" internally and alters the spacetime it lands in to create this appearance of a physical object (remembering that the police box is an arbitrary shape and though the Doctor now switched off the function, TARDISes in general are supposed to be able to change shape to "disguise" themselves: It manipulates spacetime to give the appearance of an object native to that time and place, as a simple "disguise" to protect it).
Well, I like the idea anyway. Though, I'm probably wrong by all the "official" explanations.
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes
- John Maynard Keynes

