The Dr Who thread
- Kelloggs
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1859
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:38 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: TheAntiKelloggs
- Location: Widnes or Altrincham. Take your pick.
From the book, because I don't remember watching (much of) this particular story, but: in Frontios (Peter Davison's time, I think) the Tractators pulled it under the ground, into their tunnels, by manipulating gravity.WiteWulf wrote:I can't remember the TARDIS ever being moved by some external force.
- HGFB
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 23575
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 8:51 pm 0
- Location: At my desk. Tap tap tapping.
I seem to recall it being moved by horse and cart in The Crusades too (Or maybe Marco Polo. I hate the historicals)
The "whistle" was a Statenheim remote control only used in The Two Doctors. However the very existence of the Two Doctors brings horrible, long arguments over a possible extra season that fits in between the end of the Troughton era and the beginning of Pertwee. We really don't want to go there. Trust me. It gets violent.
The "whistle" was a Statenheim remote control only used in The Two Doctors. However the very existence of the Two Doctors brings horrible, long arguments over a possible extra season that fits in between the end of the Troughton era and the beginning of Pertwee. We really don't want to go there. Trust me. It gets violent.
My bag is called Mr Shitface
- WiteWulf
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10125
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 11:20 am 0
- PSN: WiteWulf
- Location: Loughborough(ish)
Yes...I have very vague recollections of watching reruns of Troughton episodes when I was little. I wondered for years why they only ever seemed to show Pertwee and Baker reruns as I got older (before the advent of UK Gold) and was horrified when I discovered the reason for the lack of Hartnell and Troughton reruns and the whole tape wiping debacle.
I actually spent a long time this afternoon reading through all the stuff on Wikipedia about Doctor Who, trying to remind myself of all the old plot arcs. When I came across the concept of the Cartmel Masterplan I have to admit to being intrigued. Outside of the post '89 novels has this ever been summarised or written down anywhere?
I actually spent a long time this afternoon reading through all the stuff on Wikipedia about Doctor Who, trying to remind myself of all the old plot arcs. When I came across the concept of the Cartmel Masterplan I have to admit to being intrigued. Outside of the post '89 novels has this ever been summarised or written down anywhere?
:::G:::
PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
PSN: WiteWulf
Switch: SW-3941-2878-7584
Steam: WITEWULF66
- DutchLlama
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 1:09 pm 0
- Location: Fhloston Paradise with llovely Leeloo... Sweet! :)
Well I just saw the Impossible Planet. Nice but rather less interesting than the provious one.
It reminded me a bit of Red Dwarf, with the same kind of sets.
The creature from the pit (literally this time) routine has been done to pieces so I hope they find a more original twist to it.
Oh and aren't black holes supposed to be invisible because they even suck up light?
Shame that the nicest looking girl had to be the first to be sucked out of an airlock, it would have spiced up the next episode if she had been around to ogle at. I wouldn't have minded her as the Doctor's next assistant.

It reminded me a bit of Red Dwarf, with the same kind of sets.
The creature from the pit (literally this time) routine has been done to pieces so I hope they find a more original twist to it.
Oh and aren't black holes supposed to be invisible because they even suck up light?
Shame that the nicest looking girl had to be the first to be sucked out of an airlock, it would have spiced up the next episode if she had been around to ogle at. I wouldn't have minded her as the Doctor's next assistant.

Boy: "Have you met monsters before?" The Doctor: "Yes."
Boy: "Are you scared of them?" The Doctor: "No, they are scared of me!"
Boy: "Are you scared of them?" The Doctor: "No, they are scared of me!"
Yes, this was mentioned on Confidental for this episode - the f/x guys went for the 'accurate' scientific look but then 'God' (sorry, RTD I mean) decided that they weren't impressive enough (or words to that effect) and asked for them to be enhanced a bit, citing artistic licence ...........DutchLlama wrote: Oh and aren't black holes supposed to be invisible because they even suck up light?![]()
Is there anything he is useful at anyway?IronGiant wrote: Yes, this was mentioned on Confidental for this episode - the f/x guys went for the 'accurate' scientific look but then 'God' (sorry, RTD I mean) decided that they weren't impressive enough (or words to that effect) and asked for them to be enhanced a bit, citing artistic licence ...........
Armed with a Cintiq+4+bless I'm off to fight bad taste!
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
- Wibble
- Baaaaaa!

- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 10:13 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: misterwibble
- Location: The Hague - The Netherlands
- Contact:
Assuming the universe is potentially limitless, there's also a rather large chance that somewhere in this sphere, there would be a black hole which would defy our definition.IronGiant wrote:Yes, this was mentioned on Confidental for this episode - the f/x guys went for the 'accurate' scientific look but then 'God' (sorry, RTD I mean) decided that they weren't impressive enough (or words to that effect) and asked for them to be enhanced a bit, citing artistic licence ...........DutchLlama wrote: Oh and aren't black holes supposed to be invisible because they even suck up light?![]()
So there... stop trying to make Dr Who into a science show
-W
- DutchLlama
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 1:09 pm 0
- Location: Fhloston Paradise with llovely Leeloo... Sweet! :)
- DutchLlama
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6038
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2002 1:09 pm 0
- Location: Fhloston Paradise with llovely Leeloo... Sweet! :)
- Kelloggs
- Baaaaa!

- Posts: 1859
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:38 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: TheAntiKelloggs
- Location: Widnes or Altrincham. Take your pick.
No, good question. I seem to remember an oddity about rotating (or maybe non-rotating) black holes. Ah. Accretion discs. Must be rotating ones, then. Doesn't matter; I think it applies anyway. Basically, anything falling through the event horizon whole won't ever be coming back, but anything torn apart by tidal (gravitational) forces before that point can do whatever the hell it feels like. If this includes emitting photons away from the black hole, then so be it, but you'd never see them unless they happened to be aimed at you. So I suspect you could detect some energy output, but unless it's really powerful, like an infalling star, there won't be much.DutchLlama wrote:Oh and aren't black holes supposed to be invisible because they even suck up light?
This is nothing to do with Hawking radiation, by the way. That's quantum mechanics.
Hawking radiation is the only known output from black holes.
But that doesnt mean you cant see huge globs of swirly mass just before the event horizon anyway.
But that doesnt mean you cant see huge globs of swirly mass just before the event horizon anyway.
-
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.
want to read eye-wateringly bad stories? No? Ok.

