Whatever it takes to get rid of this conceit that we have a right to a good national team. And to stop the commentators going on about 1966.Jamie wrote:McClaren out NOW please, before it's too late.
If he stays in the job then we have another Graham Taylor era to look forward to...
FOOTBALL: Season 2006/07 Discussion Thread
- Governmentyard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11757
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
- Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard
XBox Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Everything else: governmentyard
Everything else: governmentyard
- Governmentyard
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 11757
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:41 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: GovernmentYard
- Yahoo Messenger: governmentyard
Ah, but in 1966....aureole wrote:McClaren is just trying to do whatever the tabloids tell him too. Going to 3-5-2 was the right PR move.![]()
It's not entirely McClaren's fault anyway: I do subsribe to the idea that you can't bung players from 8 different clubs together and expect them to gel. The players are massively underperforming.
XBox Gamertag: GovernmentYard
Everything else: governmentyard
Everything else: governmentyard
- merman
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10943
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: merman1974
- Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
- Location: Skegness, England
- Contact:
You can if they are playing a formation they know. 4-5-1 or 4-4-2 would have been SO much better.aureole wrote:McClaren is just trying to do whatever the tabloids tell him too. Going to 3-5-2 was the right PR move.![]()
It's not entirely McClaren's fault anyway: I do subsribe to the idea that you can't bung players from 8 different clubs together and expect them to gel. The players are massively underperforming.
And then McClueless panicked, sent on three subs at once in the 70th minute and left Ashley Cole limping around the pitch for quarter of an hour.
Oh, and yet again, Defoe gets on ahead of Darren Bent.
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
True, but isn't that what McClaren's job is? To get them to play together properly?aureole wrote:McClaren is just trying to do whatever the tabloids tell him too. Going to 3-5-2 was the right PR move.![]()
It's not entirely McClaren's fault anyway: I do subsribe to the idea that you can't bung players from 8 different clubs together and expect them to gel. The players are massively underperforming.
In the last two games the players really don't look like they can be bothered to play for their country, and they certainly don't look like they care about winning, I think we've had maybe 3 shots on target in the last 180 mins of football.
Not only is it the manager's job to pick the team and the tactics (something that last night showed McClaren is totally clueless at) but also to give the players the drive and togetherness and team spirit that is needed to play as a team. Something that someone like Martin O'Neill seems to be very good at, if only...
- fog
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 6022
- Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:08 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: Dense Fog
- PSN: DenseFog
- Location: Newcastle, England
- Contact:
Isn't that what international football is all about though, getting the best players available to work together as a team? Isn't it exactly the same for every other international manager? And if they are so unfamilar with each other then didn't also resorting to an unfamiliar formation just compound the problem?aureole wrote:C'mon, there isn't a cohesive unit of any players ready to be lifted from any club that I can think of. Seriously, can anyone name a decent quartet or even trio of players that play next to each other we could stick together?
The closest we have is the Cole-Lamps-Terry-cole edge of the left/center.
If there's one area you need to be strong at as an international manager to get the best out of players it's tactics. McClaren has never shown anything at any level to suggest he has what it takes. In contrast many of the players have shown they have what it takes to compete at the top level.
- ShadowTail
- Baaa!

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:10 pm 0
In what sort of strange fantasy land was that formation called 3-5-2?
I'm fairly sure 3 centre-backs + 2 full backs = 5 defenders - Cole and especially Neville were not playing as wing backs - they were full backs that wandered out of position every now and again. Surely this is a 5-3-2??
So with a 5 man defence you'd have thought that would leave 5 men to run at the Croatian defence and cause some pressure - no, don't be silly. Parker and Carrick will both play holding positions! So we might as well have called the formation 7-1-2 and be done with it.
Not that I blame the formation - I blame who was chosen to play the positions and the players for being crap.
I'm fairly sure 3 centre-backs + 2 full backs = 5 defenders - Cole and especially Neville were not playing as wing backs - they were full backs that wandered out of position every now and again. Surely this is a 5-3-2??
So with a 5 man defence you'd have thought that would leave 5 men to run at the Croatian defence and cause some pressure - no, don't be silly. Parker and Carrick will both play holding positions! So we might as well have called the formation 7-1-2 and be done with it.
Not that I blame the formation - I blame who was chosen to play the positions and the players for being crap.
- merman
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10943
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: merman1974
- Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
- Location: Skegness, England
- Contact:
Huh, we lost 5-1 AT HOME to managerless West Brom.Mat T wrote:You know your football club is in crisis when you lose 4-0 at home to Stoke City.
Leeds are in a dire situation at the moment. Gutted.
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine




