The Sony PS3 thread (apparently *still* obnoxious!)

Inane baanter or words of wisdom - you decide...
Locked
User avatar
Roobarb
Baaaaa!
Baaaaa!
Posts: 1451
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:37 pm 0
Location: Blighty

Post by Roobarb »

Personally i think it should have been called the "Official Sony Fanboy Fear and Loathing Thread" :P
Kronos

Post by Kronos »

Thread title is just a joke sheesh :). I can't really see the PS3 not selling at least 1/3 of what the PS1 or PS2 sold in their lifespans, which would still be enough to be no1 let alone survive and that's just based on the games it plays. I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360. But the gameplay trailers have come along so much, and yet the 360s graphical output for fast paced games hasn't really improved (Testdrive, Carbon, even Moto GP glitches on some aspects in replays etc) so I'm not worried about this being "teh f4Ll of teh s0nyZ" etc

RE:Gears of War Vs Resistance...are you crazy??? Can you not see the chugging and tearing when you pan your viewpoint, can't you see the difference in animation smoothness REGARDLESS of what is happening on screen? Gears of Wars has improved A LOT and is quite impressive (thinking of buying it if 360 doesn't sell actually) but if you think graphically it is up to Resistance ....... ;)

FPS is fine, if done well, saying "Oh no not another FPS" is ok for you but I counter with "Oh no, not another childish plinky plonky mario game gahhhh" Horses for courses ;) FPS with not enough people online, ok now that IS *shit* I agree.

End of the day I bought all my last 4 consoles correctly for a specific game not fanboyism (WRC, Colin McRae 3, NFS Most Wanted, honestly can't remember the one I got my GC for but keeping it around for hope of a cheap copy of RE4 anyway) aslong as you like what you spent your money on then that's fine. If the premium 360 was £100 less would be worth it, if Wii was £100-125ish then it would be worth a punt, and I guess honestly £100-£150 less PS3 without Blu-Ray would have been a nice thing to offer too sure. 360 has good 3rd party support, but I would be worried that yet again Nintendo will die on its lack of 3rd party support especially over here.
User avatar
frak
Baaaaa!
Baaaaa!
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 11:48 pm 0
Location: Lincs, UK

Post by frak »

Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.

Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.

:D
User avatar
sponge
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3227
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 9:05 am 0
Location: Twatting around in Los Angeles, California.

Re: PS3 Superiority and general validation of arrogance for

Post by sponge »

Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Well seeing as it is the best of the "next gen" console (not that there are any others really ;) ) about time we had a single thread for all things PS3 no?

So to kick off....

Resistance:Fall of man is looking smoother and smoother with each posted vid, this is probably going to be the one that sells it for me. So polished it shines through a lead door! Check out the Gamersday uploads on GT, the tell tale sign of well coded graphics is the lack of screen tear when rotating the viewpoint during action :)


Anyone know what's happening with that quirky little title we were teased with called "Afrika" ages ago??

Also anyone have PS3 specific vids for NFS:Carbon (the ones on GT are for the 360, and contrary to what everyone said there is still lag on the full retail copy of that game too 8O)
Resistance. Ick. Shhhhh -Part of why I left that company was to avoid working on that game.

;)
User avatar
Kemper_Boyd
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 11967
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:15 pm 0

Post by Kemper_Boyd »

frak wrote:
Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.

Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.

:D
Unless there's some top secret unannounced feature to the RSX it is inferior
to the 360 GPU.
User avatar
Duck Turkin
Baaaaa!
Baaaaa!
Posts: 1682
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 4:51 am 0
Location: Down South

Post by Duck Turkin »

The Famitsu scores aren't too bad for launch games, I'm especially pleased that Ridge Racer 7 gets 36/40, since I've loved most of the other RR games for a while now.
User avatar
Rod_S
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13474
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 10:18 pm 0
Location: Badsville
Contact:

Post by Rod_S »

Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Thread title is just a joke sheesh :). I can't really see the PS3 not selling at least 1/3 of what the PS1 or PS2 sold in their lifespans, which would still be enough to be no1 let alone survive and that's just based on the games it plays. I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360. But the gameplay trailers have come along so much, and yet the 360s graphical output for fast paced games hasn't really improved (Testdrive, Carbon, even Moto GP glitches on some aspects in replays etc) so I'm not worried about this being "teh f4Ll of teh s0nyZ" etc

RE:Gears of War Vs Resistance...are you crazy??? Can you not see the chugging and tearing when you pan your viewpoint, can't you see the difference in animation smoothness REGARDLESS of what is happening on screen? Gears of Wars has improved A LOT and is quite impressive (thinking of buying it if 360 doesn't sell actually) but if you think graphically it is up to Resistance ....... ;)

FPS is fine, if done well, saying "Oh no not another FPS" is ok for you but I counter with "Oh no, not another childish plinky plonky mario game gahhhh" Horses for courses ;) FPS with not enough people online, ok now that IS *shit* I agree.

End of the day I bought all my last 4 consoles correctly for a specific game not fanboyism (WRC, Colin McRae 3, NFS Most Wanted, honestly can't remember the one I got my GC for but keeping it around for hope of a cheap copy of RE4 anyway) aslong as you like what you spent your money on then that's fine. If the premium 360 was £100 less would be worth it, if Wii was £100-125ish then it would be worth a punt, and I guess honestly £100-£150 less PS3 without Blu-Ray would have been a nice thing to offer too sure. 360 has good 3rd party support, but I would be worried that yet again Nintendo will die on its lack of 3rd party support especially over here.
WTF?
User avatar
Alarm
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 9046
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 10:45 pm 0
Location: Welsh Wales
Contact:

Post by Alarm »

Rod_S wrote: WTF?
PS3 FTW in Obsak speak, I think. I'm unsure too.
User avatar
swith
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 4538
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:57 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: swith
Location: Dundee
Contact:

Post by swith »

Alarm wrote:
Rod_S wrote: WTF?
PS3 FTW in Obsak speak, I think. I'm unsure too.
I think he's saying he quite likes the look of that Wii sports bowling.
User avatar
fro
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2593
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 10:44 pm 0

Post by fro »

swith wrote:
Alarm wrote:
Rod_S wrote: WTF?
PS3 FTW in Obsak speak, I think. I'm unsure too.
I think he's saying he quite likes the look of that Wii sports bowling.
Nah, he's saying that he shagged your sister.

Or something.
YOUR IMAGINARY FRIEND
User avatar
Marius
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:34 pm 0
Location: Oslo, Norway

Post by Marius »

Deckard wrote:
Marius wrote:
Deckard wrote:Thats a review ?
Noooo. that is a link to an article that gives us the scores given by Famitsu, silly :D
So just a review of some assorted games rather than a full hardware launch review ?
Mhm, something like that. I was mostly interested in Resistance. It seems good but a bit overhyped, something the score perhaps reflects. I'm interested if the same thing will happen to GoW. But of course, it's a western FPS being reviewed in Japan, so in that regard perhaps 33/40 is not half bad, as Eurogamer pointed out?
User avatar
disciple
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 13941
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:33 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: LiberMentis
PSN: Prime_Heretic
Location: Greenfield
Contact:

Re: PS3 Superiority and general validation of arrogance for

Post by disciple »

Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:Well seeing as it is the best of the "next gen" console (not that there are any others really ;) ) about time we had a single thread for all things PS3 no?
It certainly is the best!
Old_but_still_a_kid wrote:So to kick off....

Resistance:Fall of man is looking smoother and smoother with each posted vid, this is probably going to be the one that sells it for me.
Those non-jerky games are my favourite type too! :)
PS4 : Prime_Heretic
Steam: bitstorm
Elite Dangerous: Cmdr Britain
User avatar
grue
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 9178
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 1:33 pm 0
Location: Greece
Contact:

Post by grue »

ObSaK you should be propaganda manager of any selfrespecting dictatorship. Your name would mean gold. :lol:
Armed with a Cintiq+4+bless I'm off to fight bad taste!
Take a look at my art and t-shirts
Kronos

Post by Kronos »

swith wrote:
Alarm wrote:
Rod_S wrote: WTF?
PS3 FTW in Obsak speak, I think. I'm unsure too.
I think he's saying he quite likes the look of that Wii sports bowling.
Wii Tennis looked good on Gadget show last week, if Nintendo badger Sega into doing Virtua Tennis 3 on it...... :)
Kronos

Post by Kronos »

frak wrote:
Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.

Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.

:D
Not worried personally, worried because I've gone from Outrun 2,Rallysport 2 and Colin McRea 4/5 ultra slick goodness to supposed next gen laggy rubbish which looks all the worse for its bloom lighting and HDR :P

If it was out in the shops today there would be one in my house now so that's not really an issue. The point was I was getting fed up with next gen stuff looking like games running on slightly under powered PCs for their requirements...whats the point in that *meh*
Kemper_Boyd wrote:
frak wrote:
Old_but_still_a_fanboy wrote: I admit that I was worried by the obviously fake trailers (I know Killzone wasn't even close to game engine!! ) of 2005 and hearing that the Nvidia card in the PS3 wasn't up to the ATI chip in the 360.
It's sad to see a fanboy worry over the fact his #1 console of choice may be released with a component weaker than that of its opposition.

Worrying over a console you've not sunk a single penny into? whatever next.

:D
Unless there's some top secret unannounced feature to the RSX it is inferior
to the 360 GPU.
Nothing secret a 6 series chip did seam a bit mean for the specs, I'm guessing the polished titles just manage to make good use of Cell & RSX together.
Locked