Ok, who wants to come up with the most ridiculous thing it could possibly be? I open with a radio you can use the analog wand to "tune" in to, with twisting the wand changing the channel.Samus wrote:Talk about how the Wii changes the way you play games, we're working to include an accessory in GT Pro Series that will make this game a must have. Stay tuned, literally.
FCIE was an absolute turd, so lets hope that along with new maps, characters and equipment they also add gameplay that's actually fun..Far Cry Wii will include elements from Far Cry Insticts Evolution, in addition to a fresh storyline, new maps, characters and equipment. Second and even more importantly, Far Cry has strong diversity of gameplay so the game is a natural fit for the Wii remote.
Yes, because they did that ever so often.Snakey wrote:And quite right tooDarkflame wrote:Yeah, I still remember people during the N64 era going "Ewww....look at those blury textures! Not nice and sharp like my playstation"Taking a 32x32 texture and zooming it up to nearly full screen? Fuck yeah, I'd rather it looked blocky than a blurry mess. l
Mainly controlled windscreen wipers?Jamesac wrote:Ok, who wants to come up with the most ridiculous thing it could possibly be? I open with a radio you can use the analog wand to "tune" in to, with twisting the wand changing the channel.Samus wrote:Talk about how the Wii changes the way you play games, we're working to include an accessory in GT Pro Series that will make this game a must have. Stay tuned, literally.
Or you use the analog wand as a tool to "tune" the engine. Socket wrench, whatever.
Darkflame wrote:It stills looks more realistic then the majority of games released today.
Somebody hasn't seen Half Life 2... No, there were occasional really low res textures. Go back and look again...Darkflame wrote:Textures might not be ultra-high res, but they were still stunningly well made. No mapping or allignment errors either. Nor obvious repeats.
Everything! He said that resident evil looked more realistic than the majority of games released today.Samus wrote: What has that got to do with anything he wrote?
Smiley...hmmm...ok.
Yes, actually, they did it all the time because that was the biggest size texture the N64 could handle, and it also had to be pretty low poly. Jeez.Darkflame wrote:Yes, because they did that ever so often.
Well if you really want to put it that way - pretty much. Except that as I've said before, a lot of Mario was massively repeated textures or no textures at all.Darkflame wrote:Ocarina and Mario was a blury mess completely inferiour to the wonders of the PS1.
Get this man some glasses.Darkflame wrote:As I said, I prefer blur to pixals.
Its closer to reality.
Dude, what is wrong with you, seriously? I mean...Darkflame wrote:Guess that makes the DS version of M64 suppiour in rendering too now, as well as texture resolution and polycounts
...how many times do you want me to say, in this very thread, that the graphics are not really important? Maybe you didn't notice I was actually sticking up for RE4 and also pointing out that this problem won't even happen on the Wii?Darkflame wrote:It stills looks more realistic then the majority of games released today.
Textures might not be ultra-high res, but they were still stunningly well made. No mapping or allignment errors either. Nor obvious repeats.
*looks at release lists*Snakey wrote:You're kidding, surely?Samus wrote:Majority being the key word here
