EU referendum are you in or out

[PumaG]

"an actual prime minister, not a comedy clown mascot prime minster........"

[gravy]

I disagree with all the labels being associated with the murder of the MP. The bigger picture is that mental illness and the 2 ideologies in that photo are products of our society and theres a million words being said without anyone addressing societiys issues reasonably (except Jo Cox's husband)

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... rong-views

[PumaG]

I disagree with all the labels being associated with the murder of the MP. The bigger picture is that mental illness and the 2 ideologies in that photo are products of our society and theres a million words being said without anyone addressing societiys issues reasonably (except Jo Cox's husband)

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... rong-views

After touring europe, he wrote a paper on thi s (onlky weeks before she was killed)

He hopes people will debate with personal experience, then the debates stop being abstract as communities become more diverse.

He claims mainstream politicians are "clueless" and government policy is a master class in how to get the migrant crisis wrong.

Criticising the obsession with numbers, he said "when they should focus on reinforcing frames of fairness"

[tufty]

If he was writing about his wife's murder weeks before she was killed, don't you think the police should know?

[PumaG]

If he was writing about his wife's murder weeks before she was killed, don't you think the police should know?

What are you on about?

[gravy]

You're posting pissed aren't you?

[PumaG]

You're posting pissed aren't you?

him or me?

[gravy]

Yep, pissed

[Rubisco]

Criticising the obsession with numbers, he said "when they should focus on reinforcing frames of fairness"

"Fairness". The most useless word in political discourse.

[PumaG]

You're posting pissed aren't you?

Yep, pissed

Heavy bait. Smells nice.

[tufty]

What are you on about?

I'm poking fun at the fact you can't string a coherent sentence together, let alone a coherent train of thought. But seeing as you seem to be as challenged with reading as you are with writing, here I go explaining a joke. Thus, of course, making it even more unfunny than it was before.

You said this, a while back. I'm sure you remember.

I disagree with all the labels being associated with the murder of the MP. … theres a million words being said without anyone addressing societiys issues reasonably (except Jo Cox's husband)

Then gravy posted what Jo Cox's husband was actually saying about her murder, to which you responded (my emphasis)

After touring europe, he wrote a paper on thi s (onlky weeks before she was killed)

So, in the context of "what Jo Cox's husband said about her murder" you came out with "he wrote this weeks before she was killed"

Yes, I understand you're now talking about something entirely different, because you are seemingly incapable of keeping a single stream of thought going for a whole sentence, let alone across multiple posts. But it struck me as amusing, because what you wrote could be taken as insinuating Jo Cox's husband knew about her (then upcoming) murder weeks before it happened, and I've watched enough "Murder, she wrote" to know it's usually the husband that's behind it all.

p.s. Invest in a spell checker.

[Darkflame]

You're posting pissed aren't you?

If theres one thing I will never blame anyone for its getting pissed as a response to modern politics.
Its probably the correct response.

[PumaG]

What are you on about?

I'm poking fun at the fact you can't string a coherent sentence together, let alone a coherent train of thought. But seeing as you seem to be as challenged with reading as you are with writing, here I go explaining a joke. Thus, of course, making it even more unfunny than it was before.

You said this, a while back. I'm sure you remember.

I disagree with all the labels being associated with the murder of the MP. … theres a million words being said without anyone addressing societiys issues reasonably (except Jo Cox's husband)

Then gravy posted what Jo Cox's husband was actually saying about her murder, to which you responded (my emphasis)

After touring europe, he wrote a paper on thi s (onlky weeks before she was killed)

So, in the context of "what Jo Cox's husband said about her murder" you came out with "he wrote this weeks before she was killed"

Yes, I understand you're now talking about something entirely different, because you are seemingly incapable of keeping a single stream of thought going for a whole sentence, let alone across multiple posts. But it struck me as amusing, because what you wrote could be taken as insinuating Jo Cox's husband knew about her (then upcoming) murder weeks before it happened, and I've watched enough "Murder, she wrote" to know it's usually the husband that's behind it all.

p.s. Invest in a spell checker.

The comment gravy quoted of mine was based on an article that I linked him to, he chose to ignore it.
My latest reply shows quotes from that article. Judging by his reaction he's obviously bored on his flight home. He knows I read the guardian so still not what sure he's getting at.

My reply to you was an imitation of your earlier style towards me, as to avoid argument. (you avoided it the first time I used it)
Given your latest reply is more civil, I'll refrain from using it again. Yes your joke was funny (when I ignore that I was referring to a link above it as 'thi s' )

I've made typos, not spelling errors (a temporary keyboard to help load a new OS) That jibe wasn't worth brushing the cobwebs off by the way. It's been what.. getting on for 10 years before spell checker investment was needed?

[tufty]

(you avoided it the first time I used it)

No, I was in bed. And it didn't warrant a reply anyway.

[(o)(o)]

Puma and Pogo you should start a thread together!



Interesting realities on EU law from a Liverpool professor (video) :

https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2016/06/16 ... um-debate/