Oh, absolutely. My quip was just a bit of pulling your leg, really.RiK wrote:Thing is, again, it's not about fancy kit or photoshops skills etc. It's about having a good eye for a shot.
It'd be a shame of the comps went the way of the dodo, though.
Oh, absolutely. My quip was just a bit of pulling your leg, really.RiK wrote:Thing is, again, it's not about fancy kit or photoshops skills etc. It's about having a good eye for a shot.

Well, that's kinda the point of a photography competition, to encourage people to persue more than a casual interest in photography!k345y wrote:They're obviously done by folks with more than a casual interest.
We've got these competitions in the spirit of encouraging us to get out and take better photos, so, let's try and keep that in mind and keep these competitions all about having fun, being creative and improving our photographic skills eh?
Or, you could look at it another way and use it to inspire you to try something new with your photography. That's exactly what happened with me when I used to look at the photos Ian (Xstreme) was posting which inspired me to get back into photography and raise my game..k345y wrote:It can feel quite intimidating to post a pic beside accomplished snappers.
Yeah, that's not going to happen. How would you determine who's in each level? What's to stop a keen enthusiast entering the beginners category etc? Quite aside from that, given we've only been getting a handful of entries in total, we'd end up with categories with one entry in...k345y wrote:You should keep the comps going but have different entry levels
Well yes it is, but I guess you've got a different definition of 'huge' to me..k345y wrote:As it stands the whole thread is grouped into one huge dynamic.
Actress, bishop …RiK wrote:I guess you've got a different definition of 'huge' to me..
RiK wrote:Well, that's kinda the point of a photography competition, to encourage people to persue more than a casual interest in photography!k345y wrote:They're obviously done by folks with more than a casual interest.
From the 'rules'We've got these competitions in the spirit of encouraging us to get out and take better photos, so, let's try and keep that in mind and keep these competitions all about having fun, being creative and improving our photographic skills eh?Or, you could look at it another way and use it to inspire you to try something new with your photography. That's exactly what happened with me when I used to look at the photos Ian (Xstreme) was posting which inspired me to get back into photography and raise my game..k345y wrote:It can feel quite intimidating to post a pic beside accomplished snappers.
Yeah, that's not going to happen. How would you determine who's in each level? What's to stop a keen enthusiast entering the beginners category etc? Quite aside from that, given we've only been getting a handful of entries in total, we'd end up with categories with one entry in...k345y wrote:You should keep the comps going but have different entry levels
Well yes it is, but I guess you've got a different definition of 'huge' to me..k345y wrote:As it stands the whole thread is grouped into one huge dynamic.

Nah, no salt intended. Just trying to keep a convo open.k345y wrote:Vinegar with salt, sir?


Heh.. C'mon, there are way better photographers than me on here (Ian, I'm looking at you dude!)..OnlyIntruder wrote:How about a "Beat the Rik" Competition? Rik takes a photo of something, and everyone else has to take a similar photo of the same subject/style/technical usage etc.
Well, to be honest that was exactly what I've always hoped would be the case, but we've simply struggled to get the interest from people to do so.OnlyIntruder wrote:Joking aside, personally I've not had much interest in recent subjects, such as being too vague or general. I know the reason for this is to try and open the competition to more people or to try and create a bit of creativity and variety but it just lacks direction. So if it's one thing I'd like to see in future competitions, is just that we have more defined subjects. They could still be simple but rather, to the point, examples could be of objects or places such as "Statues" or "Cityscape" but we could also expand on that to give direction of particular styles or technical aspects of photography - give people something to try out and do, such as macro or DoF photography. Heck even have subjects where people try out unusual methods of photography, like using water droplets on a lens to create a macro shot etc.
I do think there's some merit in that, and following Gravy's lead with the recent music competition, I'll post a global announcement for the next one that points people at the current topic and encourages them to get involved.OnlyIntruder wrote: The only other suggestion I can think of is to have a thread/sticky/announcement in bleatings that announces new competitions and direct them to the relevant thread.

That's a lie! You usually do!RiK wrote:I can't win!

Well yeah, I've won a few of them, but so have lots of other people. I've also had months like this where I entered what I thought was a pretty reasonable, on-topic pic, which did a Norway...tufty wrote:That's a lie! You usually do!RiK wrote:I can't win!
</coat>



Never used photobucket so no idea I'm afraid. Flickr is your best bet by far for ease of embedding.Portland wrote:Since the death (or price hike) of photobucket, I've used Imgur as my go to cloud store. Have asked peeps several times for advice how to embed pics, especially using the mobile site, but never got a response. Anyone got a clue?