noodles wrote:merman wrote:Boris: we want a deal without the backstop
Really? What credible solution for the Irish border do you have then? Because that's why the backstop was part of the Withdrawal Agreement Theresa May negotiated (with the help of three different Brexit Secretaries).
How about the reunification of Ireland then ? Wouldn't the mad bombings (if any) only happen in Ireland ?
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson represents the Conservative & Unionist Party of Great Britain. That means it doesn't want to give up control of Northern Ireland - especially when his Government is propped up by the dodgy deal with the Democratic Unionist Party.
Angela Merkel laid a trap and Johnson walked into it. "30 days to present an alternative to the backstop" - he has none, there hasn't been any credible solutions put forward in the last 800+ days since the referendum.
And now Macron says the backstop is an "indispensable" part of any deal.
Oh, and all this piffle from de Pfeffel is trying to shift the blame onto the EU in the event of No Deal - when it's the Tory red lines (over freedom of movement and membership of the Customs Union) that are preventing the deal.
Priti Patel announces freedom of movement to and from the UK for EU citizens would end on the 1st of November in the even of No Deal - which is clearly not going to happen, according to leading immigration lawyers.