Barney wrote:Cynically, I'd expect the free govt-based broadband to be relatively low-speed (no 4k streaming) locked down (no p2p traffic, porn filter) and as it will be a govt-run ISP, heavy data collection. If you want more than that, and any sort of privacy at all then you'll go to one of the "competing" ISPs which won't be competative at all.
This is OpenReach they are talking about being nationalised not the entire shitshow.. same organisation that has given us.. low speeds (4K streaming is a doddle in Latvia and Estonia, compared to U.K.. South Korea has world No1 speeds using a similar model to the proposal !!.), a Tory porn filter - which ld requires you to share sensitive information with some of the dodgiest companies on earth (was due in the symummer but postponed), and... heavy data collection and privacy.. seriously have you not heard of mass bulk data collection ?? Much of which was deemed unlawful?? Check this..
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/ju ... -in-the-uk
No I don’t think we should be more paranoid about our data in Labour’s hands, vs a fascistic far right government running a virtual police state with a figurehead who can’t utter a true statement.
The only people bricking it have a vested interest.. idea is going down well on social media and IT circles who are frustrated with OpenRetch and us lagging behind other countries. Plus yes, free, paid for with a tax on Facebook and Google and Amazon etc.. what.. anyone opposed to these hucksters contributing a fair tax on business they do in Britain??
Funnily enough the Conservatives mocked the idea by asking what will Labour nationalise next.. pubs? Football teams?? Well they are getting a backlash as we used to have very decent national pubs, fondly remembered, and there are many examples of fan owned football clubs worldwide. Oddly Labour are coming up with innovative suggestions to improve things, whilst the Cons are bereft of ideas and can only attack based on lies!
https://twitter.com/cchqpress/status/11 ... 79969?s=21