Yes. there is no "antifa". It can't be a terrorist organisation if there is no organisation. There's no central "Antifa HQ", no "Antifa training camps" in Syria, not even an "Antifa Manfesto". There are local groups, acting outside any central control structure and without any central plan, as they see fit. Outside of those groups, there are individuals, doing what they want to do, and they are "antifa" as well. Much of "Antifa"s action is carried out at the end of a baseball bat.Jamesac wrote:Antifa is a right-wing boogeyman
Likewise the other end of the spectrum, the "Proud Boys" and "Oath Keepers" - local groups, probably very few individuals, *perhaps* more of a centralised command and control. All of their actions, as far as I can tell, involve triggering violence, and they tend to be carrying guns as well as baseball bats.
There are similarities with organisations like Al Quaida - individuals doing things entirely off their own bat, claiming membership of Al Quaida, local radical groups acting outside of any central structure, *except* that they are, AIUI, generally bankrolled by the organisation itself, and have links one way or another back to the central organisation, even if it's through friends of family members.
It's a fine line to tread. But it's pretty much summed up by this, although I suspect the tally on the right hand side might be missing a few :





