EU referendum are you in or out

Inane baanter or words of wisdom - you decide...
Post Reply

EU Are you IN or OUT

In
98
77%
Out
21
17%
Undecided (shake it all about)
8
6%
 
Total votes: 127

User avatar
Harlequin
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6505
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by Harlequin »

KlaxonCow wrote:And then you've got Trump coining the term "fake news", when he's the biggest generator of bullshit there is. Trump is the definition of "fake news".
I do not think he originated that. The seemingly RT-connected The Canary was using the term, alongside 'Mainstream Media' ('MSM'), in its promotion and defence of Jeremy Corbyn long before Ton Dump became President,
KlaxonCow wrote:So the fear-mongers call the other side "fear-mongers", and the living embodiment of "fake news" accuses everyone else of being that.
Oh, the ironing.
That appears to be the nature of collective shadows. The Cold War mostly consisted of each side accusing each other of doing what they were doing themselves.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
User avatar
Foozwah
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3156
Joined: Fri May 31, 2002 2:17 am 0
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by Foozwah »

KlaxonCow wrote:So the fear-mongers call the other side "fear-mongers", and the living embodiment of "fake news" accuses everyone else of being that.
It's this that probably does my head in more than anything else.

That and the fact that so many are either gullible enough to fall for it, or cynical enough to not call it out for what it is, or actively profit from it.
User avatar
KlaxonCow
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8445
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 3:46 am 0
Location: A large grassy field.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by KlaxonCow »

Harlequin wrote:The Cold War mostly consisted of each side accusing each other of doing what they were doing themselves.
Yeah, this is what I'm getting at.

That groups of humans - governments - are just as capable of "psychological projection" as individuals. That they assume "well, I'm lying, so the other probably is too" or "I'm secretly building up our weapons, so the other guy probably is too" and we end up with the irony that they project onto everyone else that which they know they're guilty of themselves.

(I'm reminded of American pastor Ted Haggard. He was preaching anti-gay stuff and promoting "gay conversion therapy" and such. Then it was discovered that he was using the "collection plate" money to hire rent boy off the Internet and have crystal-meth-infused orgies with them.

And, psychologically, we can see that it was really guilt fuelling his crusade against "the gays". Because he was gay himself and self-flagellating over "defying God's will" - he projected his religion-driven self-hatred at others. That he perhaps felt that he might be "undoing" his own "sin", in the eyes of God, if he "converted" other people from gay, to excuse away his own homosexuality. He projected his own feelings of guilt onto others.

He's an arsehole - as, unfortunately, religion does that to people - but there's an underlying tragedy to it all. Without God, he'd just accept that he was gay, live a more fulfilled life - maybe settle down with a loving husband - and would stop bothering other people with his silly bullshit. But, no, his wife is "standing by him" and they remain in denial, because the Bible tells them so. And the tragedy for all involved continues.

And we can also see something similar in how, too often, the most vocal voices against immigration are American-born Boris Johnson, or married-to-a-German Nigel Farage, or second generation Priti Patel... and so on and so forth. That they're perhaps "trying too hard" - the lady doth protest too much - to "prove their patriotism" to the masses, so very much overdo the hatred of immigrants - despite often being beneficiaries of it themselves - as an overcompensation of how "British" they want you to perceive them as being. "Hey, look, I'm shitting on the black man, so I'm white like you, right? Just ignore my skin colour and family history says different. I'm so British, because I'm shitting on foreigners, just like the rest of you. Please accept me.")

Basically, every time an accusation is thrown, just do a quick spot check on whether, in fact, it's just guilt-infused "projection" going on.

That the guy shouting "liar!" isn't, in fact, the biggest liar in the room, feeling all guilty about it and just presuming that everyone else is as bad as they are.
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes
User avatar
Harlequin
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6505
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by Harlequin »

KlaxonCow wrote:He's an arsehole - as, unfortunately, religion does that to people …
I am quite religious myself and know many religious people. Even among the many dozens of members of established faiths I have known, hardly any of them have been arseholes. And even the two or three who have, have been less arsey than Richard Dawkins. Perhaps you are mistaking fundamentalist extremism for ordinary worship.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
User avatar
KlaxonCow
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8445
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 3:46 am 0
Location: A large grassy field.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by KlaxonCow »

Harlequin wrote:I am quite religious myself and know many religious people. Even among the many dozens of members of established faiths I have known, hardly any of them have been arseholes. And even the two or three who have, have been less arsey than Richard Dawkins. Perhaps you are mistaking fundamentalist extremism for ordinary worship.
To be clear, what I'm calling "arsehole-ish" here is the crusade to interfere in people's lives and mess them up, with anti-gay rhetoric and "conversion therapy" and that sort of thing.

He's not a dick just for being religious, I stress. But he is a dick - by his actions - and his religion motivates that behaviour (well, more specifically, his religious beliefs coming into conflict with his own homosexuality, which motivates his behaviour as a kind of "repetence" for his "sins" and he gets aggressive about it, as the guilt seems very strong in this one).

I've always said and will continue to say that, for me, as a humanist, it's always "human first". And that my real beef with religion is how I see it making victims of the religious. I hate the sin, because I love the underlying sinner.

For me, it's bollocks. And folks living their lives - having it guide their decisions - under false pretences, with erroneous information, leads to bad decisions.

I rail at religion because I don't think it's doing anyone any good. Yes, good is done in the name of religion - my local church runs the food bank - but I believe that's really human goodness underlying it and these people would be "good without God" anyway.

To be clear, I used to be a member of that local church that runs the food bank and I've helped them out on occasion - including, unfortunately, when there was a break-in and someone tried to loot the place, and I helped nail some wood planks over the break-in point overnight until the door could be properly replaced. I get on fine with these people and I know they're all entirely well-intentioned and I trust their inherent "goodness".

Just for me, there's no gods involved there. These people are good, because most humans do want to make things better (though we all disagree on how to do that) and they have a good "heart" or good "soul" (though I quote those words because the heart is really just a blood pump and I don't believe souls exist, beyond serving as a metaphor for the entire holistic human experience). If everyone were atheist then the food bank would still exist, because humans have empathy and compassion - and I think it's actually better if it's motivated by that directly, and not filtered through some "this will get me brownie points to get into Heaven" caveats and conditions).

I understand that religious people often don't make the distinction, as they define their identities by their beliefs, but I do make it. I have zero problem with the people, I have a problem with the "bad memes" that infect their minds exactly because I feel it's compromising the person underneath it.

Like, hey, even calling that guy an arsehole, I still fully recognised the underlying unnecessary tragedy of it all for him. I still have empathy for the circumstances that got him into that unhelpful position, even if I really don't like what it's ended up making him do. Not one bit.

Again, that distinction. I know he doesn't mean to be an arsehole. I'm sure, as a person, his heart was always in the right place. But bad ideas in his head make him do hateful and damaging things to other people. So, sorry, that's what makes him an arsehole. Causing harm totally unnecessarily, in my view.
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes
User avatar
gilesgoat
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 27258
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
Location: Monfalcone, Italy
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by gilesgoat »

KlaxonCow wrote:*SNIP*
I rail at religion because I don't think it's doing anyone any good. Yes, good is done in the name of religion - my local church runs the food bank - but I believe that's really human goodness underlying it and these people would be "good without God" anyway.
*SNIP*
I am convinced that you can live an absolutely good life without any God at all.

And often I think "if it would be much better we'd all be like that" I mean if we'd stop thinking there's any God and just go on realizing "we are just micro dots on a speckle of micro dust in the middle of the universe and nothing much more".

I don't know, at times one could even think "if it really makes any better the fact there could be a God/something for real or if that is actually worse".

[edit] As in "if there's really any God then I fear I am doomed for damnation or something like that, so what is that doing any good to me ?" .. .. :roll:
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
User avatar
KlaxonCow
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 8445
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 3:46 am 0
Location: A large grassy field.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by KlaxonCow »

gilesgoat wrote:I mean if we'd stop thinking there's any God and just go on realizing "we are just micro dots on a speckle of micro dust in the middle of the universe and nothing much more".
Which is pretty much my perspective, and I see it as "if we're ever going to get out of this shit, then it's because we picked up the spade and started shovelling".

That is, nothing out there is going to save us. We have to do it ourselves. No gods nor superheroes nor magical unicorns are going to fly in and save the day. If the day is to be saved then it's 100% down to you and I to do it. If we require heroes, then we have to raise ourselves up to be those heroes... even if only just for one day.

(In fairness, there are the animals and potentially space aliens. But the animals we share this planet with are generally not going to be of much use in this quest, as they don't speak and understand things as we do, unfortunately. Though they are cute and that's nice. And though, in a universe as gargantuan as it is, I feel there's statistically almost certainly other life out there somewhere, the odds of the space aliens ever showing up is extremely low. And, even if they did, then why would they know how this "reality" thing works any better than we do? Indeed, they might show up exactly because "yeah, sorry, we fucked up our own planet and are looking for another replacement one" - I mean, if humanity ever ends up on some other planet, that's unfortunately a likely story for what we'd be doing out there in the black ourselves.)
gilesgoat wrote:I don't know, at times one could even think "if it really makes any better the fact there could be a God/something for real or if that is actually worse".
Christopher Hitchens had this argument that God, if he did exist, is the Cosmic Tyrant of a Celestial North Korea.

The point being that if all of this is just to perpetually suck the dick of some infinitely insecure deity in eternal worship then, even if that were true, fuck that for a game of dice.

It's not just "is it factually correct?", but is it any good even if it was?

I don't think so. "God's masterplan" is a chaotic piece of shit, frankly. If the gods are there and listening, what the fuck were you thinking?

But, alternatively, if this is just things falling out of chaotic natural processes and it's just the way it is because that's the way it is - per the laws of physics and all that - then it all makes vastly more abundant sense to me.

But I remain fundamentally optimistic, because there's historical precedent. Look to the past, and humanity has achieved miracles of social, technological and economic progress. We've pulled our arses out of worse shit holes than this before, so we are better than this and we can be better than this. And that's not an act of faith but just a historical fact - though glacially slow, we have slowly bumbled our way to a world that's leagues better than the atrocious shit that existed beforehand. Still a long ways to go, of course. But that's what I'm saying - we've got to keep moving things forward. Off our own backs, as nothing and no-one is going to come swooping in with any magic to fix it all up for us.

It can be done, as it has been done before.

(A common misconception is because you have Buddhists venerating Buddha, or Christians worshipping Christ, that a "humanist" therefore worships humanity. But, no, not at all. I'm quite the misanthrope, in fact, as you might have gathered by my regular complaints about our species. And I hate crowds of people, as little good ever comes from that.

Humanists don't worship humanity, or even necessarily think we're particularly good at what we do, in the main. It's more a recognition that it's just us. If we humans want things to be better, then it's up to us to raise our game to meet that challenge. And if we don't, then things will just continue to be shit. That's the long and short of it. We must endeavour to do better, for our own sakes, or absolutely nothing good nor useful will change. I like to cite Neil Armstrong on the Moon - such a milestone in human achievement... and he fluffed up his line. It was supposed to be "One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind", but he forgot the "a" and made perhaps the most famous quote in all of human history a bit meaningless. Now, that, for me, is humanity through and through. Head in the clouds, feet firmly planted in the shit.)
"Words ought to be a little wild - for they are assaults of thought on the unthinking."
- John Maynard Keynes
User avatar
gilesgoat
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 27258
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
Location: Monfalcone, Italy
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by gilesgoat »

Meanwhile ....
Britain is "ready to welcome the best and the brightest global talent", Home Secretary Priti Patel has said, as she prepares to unveil more details of her post-Brexit immigration plan.

The new system is set to come into force on New Year's Day, immediately ending freedom of movement with the EU.

Under the government's plan, those wishing to live and work in the UK must gain 70 points.

Points would be awarded for criteria such as having a job offer, holding a PhD relevant to the job, speaking English and earning more than £22,000.
.. I tick only 2 of the above ..

Thankfully I got "indefinite leave to stay" ..
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
User avatar
merman
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10943
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: merman1974
Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
Location: Skegness, England
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by merman »

So the Government that clapped for carers won't let more social care workers in under its visa scheme, when we have 100,000 vacancies in the social care sector.

And nurses and doctors from overseas will have to pay the visa fee, even though we have over 90,000 job vacancies in the NHS.

The points-based system won't attract anyone to the UK, let alone the "brightest and best". We will still allow in tax-dodging Russians and dodgy Arabs because money.



And apparently we need another advertising campaign about changes needed for Brexit.
Because more than 30% of firms are not ready for us leaving the Customs Union, regardless of any miraculous breakthrough in the negotiations.
That's another £705 million spaffed up against the Brexit wall...
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
User avatar
(o)(o)
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6885
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:21 am 0

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by (o)(o) »

User avatar
merman
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10943
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 1:44 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: merman1974
Yahoo Messenger: andrewrfisher
Location: Skegness, England
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by merman »

The incompetent Tories did not even investigate the evidence Russia was interfering in the Brexit referendum.

Another reason to stop it happening.
Twitter, Xbox, Wii U and Steam - merman1974
ZZAP is back - https://www.patreon.com/zzapmagazine
User avatar
gilesgoat
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 27258
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
Location: Monfalcone, Italy
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by gilesgoat »

I arrived to the conclusion that "the stupidity of certain people is just INFINITE" ...

So after lots of crying and swearing and such Italy managed to obtain FROM THE EU A *FUCKTON* OF MONEY ( nobody really trusted/trust to give into the hands of Italy ) for supporting the Covid crisis and post-Covid recovery, money that most of it will never have to be returned back, some of the government started to brag about and feast like if they won the lottery/battle against "the evil" ( which just gave you fuckload of money for time to come ).

Money supposedly to FIX things, help workers and do some "constructive projects" .. we'll see in how many black holes it'll end up.

So as I said instead of saying "thank you for all that" it went into a sort of "brag fest" but that's not the worst of it.

So what do you do after all this ?

Some "ultra mega nutter" of the "ultra mega nutters party" ( the 5 Stars Movement ) that been thrown out from there "because too nutter even for them" sets up "the Italexit party" because you know "now that you got all that you want to leave EU".

I am starting to ask myself "if there's a way to self-declare yourself NON-Britsh and NON-Italian but someway truly 'Citizen of the universe' or such" and to re-use that sentence from Adam Savage "I reject your politics/nationalities/laws and I replace them with my owns" ?

It's a "movement" of people that "just want to do their own things and move one with work not having to listen/see with all this crap", besides life is too short for all that.
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
User avatar
Kelloggs
Baaaaa!
Baaaaa!
Posts: 1859
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:38 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: TheAntiKelloggs
Location: Widnes or Altrincham. Take your pick.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by Kelloggs »

While I am a staunch supporter of the application of Hanlon's Razor ("Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.") I find myself wondering - how stupid is too stupid? Is it tens of stupids? Hundreds? Is there a weighting applicable, whereby some egregious stupids are so blatant that they're worth at least six or seven?

Because it seems to me that this wunch of bankers must be up in the high three digits at this point, if not higher - at what point is "stupidity" no longer a plausible defence?
User avatar
gilesgoat
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 27258
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:54 am 0
Location: Monfalcone, Italy
Contact:

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by gilesgoat »

Kelloggs wrote:*SNIP* at what point is "stupidity" no longer a plausible defence?
At this I can give "a legal answer" in Italy as well, there's this concept ( http://www.enciclopedia-juridica.com/it ... /dolus.htm ) which refers to the "persona di media avvedutezza" which could be translated as "person of common sense".

Basically "if you don't have common sense and you get conned you can't claim stupidity in your defense" ( also you can't claim the "I did not know there was a law about" as a defense ).

So unless it turns out you are totally/legally/pysically mentally incapable/impaired "stupidity is NEVER a plausible defence" .. not in the eyes of Italian law.

Basically "if I sell you a flying carpet" and you buy it, you can't go in court of law claiming "it does not work it does not fly I want my money back", actually the fact you bought it puts YOU as well into part of the crime so you are NOT defensible.

Unless you are a minor and/or something really incapable in that case is I think something like "circonvenzione di incapace/minore" which is a serious offense ( https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circonven ... e_incapaci ).

But no "you can't claim stupidity in defense".
Giles the billy goat
"Baa"
User avatar
Harlequin
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6505
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2002 4:19 am 0
Location: London, directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: EU referendum are you in or out

Post by Harlequin »

gilesgoat wrote:I am starting to ask myself "if there's a way to self-declare yourself NON-Britsh and NON-Italian but someway truly 'Citizen of the universe' or such" and to re-use that sentence from Adam Savage "I reject your politics/nationalities/laws and I replace them with my owns" ?

It's a "movement" of people that "just want to do their own things and move one with work not having to listen/see with all this crap", besides life is too short for all that.
Have you never watched Firefly?
gilesgoat wrote:Basically "if you don't have common sense and you get conned you can't claim stupidity in your defense" ( also you can't claim the "I did not know there was a law about" as a defense ).
We have similar concepts in British courts of "reasonable" judgements made by "reasonable" persons, with the hypothetical person often referred to as "the man on the Clapham omnibus" in English law (and, it curiously seems, in Canada, along with localised variations in other countries). It is also the case that "ignorance of the law is no defence". I have always thought the latter somewhat problematic as our Governments rarely make much effort to publicise all the laws they continually create and no single professional lawyer knows the details of every law that exists.
Emoticon and contraction free since... quite a while ago.
Post Reply