The Official 2005 YakYak Election Poll
- Jedburgh
- Baaaaaaa!

- Posts: 5904
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:50 pm 0
- Yahoo Messenger: dariusjedburgh23
- Location: Uncanny Valley
Just pretend to abandon it then rename it the Community Services Supplement or something. Job's a good'unHGFB wrote:Just been watching the Lib Dems on tv. Local Income tax? That sounds to me like a poll tax in sheep's clothing and will probably get the same reaction as the poll tax did.
Jedburgh
It's all about trying to work out what the fuck is going on.
It's all about trying to work out what the fuck is going on.
- HGFB
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 23575
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 8:51 pm 0
- Location: At my desk. Tap tap tapping.
I'm not sure how the Lib Dems expect to get in with a policy like that to be honest. It's all very well sticking to your principles and creating what may no doubt be a fairer policy but it isn't going to get them many votes is it?
They need to whore themselves out to public opinion and tell everyone they're going to send johnny foreigner back where he bally well comes from*
* Manchester
They need to whore themselves out to public opinion and tell everyone they're going to send johnny foreigner back where he bally well comes from*
* Manchester
My bag is called Mr Shitface
It's not a poll tax because it's based on your ability to pay (or rather your income, which is often the same thing) rather than the nominal value of your house (rates) or that fact that you exist (poll tax). The idea is that those whose income is flat - pensioners, students, the disabled etc - don't have their incoming eroded by above-inflation increases in council tax.HGFB wrote:Just been watching the Lib Dems on tv. Local Income tax? That sounds to me like a poll tax in sheep's clothing and will probably get the same reaction as the poll tax did.
With regard to getting votes, the "Axe The Tax" campaign actually went down rather well. Everybody wants rid of taxes.
- betamax
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 10520
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:36 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: Betamax_W
- Location: Coalition Anxiety
- Contact:
And yet they still want top notch public services, more police and better hospitals. People are hillarious.venusian wrote:With regard to getting votes, the "Axe The Tax" campaign actually went down rather well. Everybody wants rid of taxes.
Politician: "In this hand I have our plans for government if you vote us into power. Please ignore the transparent falshoods. In this hand I have a jar of invisible bees. *Shakes jar*
The People: Oooooooh Beeeeeeeeeees!
"Shouting lager, lager, lager, lager. Shouting lager, lager, lager, lager. Is just one of the reasons you're not welcome at Claridges any more". -Psychic Bob
- Stone
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14497
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: thestony1
- Location: Harpenden
Not enough people. Obviously.Jimaroid wrote:Well I'm people and I do, you gert-big twat.Kilroy Silk wrote: The people in this country don't want a multi-cultural society.
I'm not very impressed with the LibDems claiming to abolish uni tuition fees though - there's much better ways to spend our tax. Just as one option, why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni and then axe tuition fees when it's back down to a sensible level?
Stone
Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.Stone wrote:Just as one option, why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni and then axe tuition fees when it's back down to a sensible level?
Stone
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
- Stone
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14497
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: thestony1
- Location: Harpenden
I'd just call it sensible (;)) but I think it is. It irritates me how many people are being forced into unnecessary debt because they got told to go to uni 'because it's a good experience'Tmuk wrote:Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
Stone
I know, and I think I learned a lot more in my college course, which was very hands on and practical. At Uni all I learned about was bloody French post-modernists...fat lot of use that is to me now!Stone wrote:I'd just call it sensible (;)) but I think it is. It irritates me how many people are being forced into unnecessary debt because they got told to go to uni 'because it's a good experience'Tmuk wrote:Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
Stone
- Stone
- Sheepie Whore

- Posts: 14497
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
- XBL Gamertag: thestony1
- Location: Harpenden
It is, but the govt's leaning heavily on all secondary education institutions to get people to go to university, even if they'd have been better at a tech college or another alternative. The idea seems to be, 'Intelligent people go to university, therefore if more people go to university then there'll be more intelligent people'. Which of course led to more and more places being renamed 'University of...' so they can claim more people are going to universityMunki wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it still optional or am I missing something here.Stone wrote:why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni
Stone
Ah, understood. I thought they'd introduced a new scheme or something.Stone wrote:It is, but the govt's leaning heavily on all secondary education institutions to get people to go to university, even if they'd have been better at a tech college or another alternative. The idea seems to be, 'Intelligent people go to university, therefore if more people go to university then there'll be more intelligent people'. Which of course led to more and more places being renamed 'University of...' so they can claim more people are going to universityMunki wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it still optional or am I missing something here.Stone wrote:why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni
Stone
I guess that goes some way to explaining why most new graduates I've worked with in the past few years have been surprisingly useless.



