The Official 2005 YakYak Election Poll

Every now and then a Llamasoftie will say something interesting. Honestly! This is where we will keep these topics so that they don't get deleted.

Who gets your X in their box, then?

Conservative Party
21
13%
Labour Party
16
10%
Liberal Democrat Party
68
42%
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
No votes
Democratic Unionist Party
15
9%
Green Party
9
6%
Plaid Cymru
5
3%
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
No votes
Sinn Fein
1
1%
Scottish National Party
1
1%
Scottish Socialist Party
1
1%
UK Independence Party
1
1%
Ulster Unionist Party
1
1%
Other
7
4%
Abstain
13
8%
British National Party
1
1%
Veritas
1
1%
 
Total votes: 161

User avatar
Acronym
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 3982
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:18 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: andrew_walkingshaw
Contact:

Post by Acronym »

Owen went through too many parties. Menzies Campbell and Paddy Ashdown, point taken (and don't rule out Campbell challenging for the LD leadership eventually, I'd suggest...)
User avatar
HGFB
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 23575
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 8:51 pm 0
Location: At my desk. Tap tap tapping.

Post by HGFB »

Just been watching the Lib Dems on tv. Local Income tax? That sounds to me like a poll tax in sheep's clothing and will probably get the same reaction as the poll tax did.
My bag is called Mr Shitface
User avatar
Jedburgh
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 5904
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:50 pm 0
Yahoo Messenger: dariusjedburgh23
Location: Uncanny Valley

Post by Jedburgh »

HGFB wrote:Just been watching the Lib Dems on tv. Local Income tax? That sounds to me like a poll tax in sheep's clothing and will probably get the same reaction as the poll tax did.
Just pretend to abandon it then rename it the Community Services Supplement or something. Job's a good'un :D
Jedburgh

It's all about trying to work out what the fuck is going on.
User avatar
HGFB
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 23575
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 8:51 pm 0
Location: At my desk. Tap tap tapping.

Post by HGFB »

I'm not sure how the Lib Dems expect to get in with a policy like that to be honest. It's all very well sticking to your principles and creating what may no doubt be a fairer policy but it isn't going to get them many votes is it?

They need to whore themselves out to public opinion and tell everyone they're going to send johnny foreigner back where he bally well comes from* :)







* Manchester
My bag is called Mr Shitface
User avatar
venusian
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 6651
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 2:22 pm 0
Location: South Gloucestershire

Post by venusian »

HGFB wrote:Just been watching the Lib Dems on tv. Local Income tax? That sounds to me like a poll tax in sheep's clothing and will probably get the same reaction as the poll tax did.
It's not a poll tax because it's based on your ability to pay (or rather your income, which is often the same thing) rather than the nominal value of your house (rates) or that fact that you exist (poll tax). The idea is that those whose income is flat - pensioners, students, the disabled etc - don't have their incoming eroded by above-inflation increases in council tax.

With regard to getting votes, the "Axe The Tax" campaign actually went down rather well. Everybody wants rid of taxes.
User avatar
betamax
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 10520
Joined: Thu May 01, 2003 11:36 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: Betamax_W
Location: Coalition Anxiety
Contact:

Post by betamax »

venusian wrote:With regard to getting votes, the "Axe The Tax" campaign actually went down rather well. Everybody wants rid of taxes.
And yet they still want top notch public services, more police and better hospitals. People are hillarious.

Politician: "In this hand I have our plans for government if you vote us into power. Please ignore the transparent falshoods. In this hand I have a jar of invisible bees. *Shakes jar*

The People: Oooooooh Beeeeeeeeeees!
"Shouting lager, lager, lager, lager. Shouting lager, lager, lager, lager. Is just one of the reasons you're not welcome at Claridges any more". -Psychic Bob
User avatar
Jimaroid
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 5146
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 12:21 pm 0
Location: Dundee

Post by Jimaroid »

I heard a radio interview with Kilroy Silk at lunchtime today. Proper shouty listening:
Kilroy Silk wrote: The people in this country don't want a multi-cultural society.
Well I'm people and I do, you gert-big twat.
User avatar
Stone
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 14497
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: thestony1
Location: Harpenden

Post by Stone »

Jimaroid wrote:
Kilroy Silk wrote: The people in this country don't want a multi-cultural society.
Well I'm people and I do, you gert-big twat.
Not enough people. Obviously.

I'm not very impressed with the LibDems claiming to abolish uni tuition fees though - there's much better ways to spend our tax. Just as one option, why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni and then axe tuition fees when it's back down to a sensible level? :?

Stone
User avatar
Mayhem
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 12572
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 3:06 pm 0
Location: Londonish
Contact:

Post by Mayhem »

From what I heard they were looking to fund the abolition of student fees with revenue from the new 50% level of income tax they would introduce.
Lie with passion and be forever damned...

Xbox: Mayhem64
User avatar
Tmuk
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7598
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 11:42 am 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Tmuk »

Stone wrote:Just as one option, why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni and then axe tuition fees when it's back down to a sensible level? :?

Stone
Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
User avatar
Stone
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 14497
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: thestony1
Location: Harpenden

Post by Stone »

Tmuk wrote:Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
I'd just call it sensible (;)) but I think it is. It irritates me how many people are being forced into unnecessary debt because they got told to go to uni 'because it's a good experience' :(

Stone
User avatar
Tmuk
Baaaaaaa!
Baaaaaaa!
Posts: 7598
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 11:42 am 0
Location: London
Contact:

Post by Tmuk »

Stone wrote:
Tmuk wrote:Makes a lot of sense. I've just finished Uni. I didn't really want to go, and 80% of my loan went on nights out and CDs.
I could be wrong, but isn't what you said kind of the Tory way of thinking on this issue?
I'd just call it sensible (;)) but I think it is. It irritates me how many people are being forced into unnecessary debt because they got told to go to uni 'because it's a good experience' :(

Stone
I know, and I think I learned a lot more in my college course, which was very hands on and practical. At Uni all I learned about was bloody French post-modernists...fat lot of use that is to me now!
User avatar
Munky
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2209
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:11 pm 0

Post by Munky »

Stone wrote:why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it still optional or am I missing something here.
User avatar
Stone
Sheepie Whore
Sheepie Whore
Posts: 14497
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 6:49 pm 0
XBL Gamertag: thestony1
Location: Harpenden

Post by Stone »

Munki wrote:
Stone wrote:why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it still optional or am I missing something here.
It is, but the govt's leaning heavily on all secondary education institutions to get people to go to university, even if they'd have been better at a tech college or another alternative. The idea seems to be, 'Intelligent people go to university, therefore if more people go to university then there'll be more intelligent people'. Which of course led to more and more places being renamed 'University of...' so they can claim more people are going to university :?

Stone
User avatar
Munky
Baaaaaa!
Baaaaaa!
Posts: 2209
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:11 pm 0

Post by Munky »

Stone wrote:
Munki wrote:
Stone wrote:why not give up on forcing 50% of teenagers into uni
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it still optional or am I missing something here.
It is, but the govt's leaning heavily on all secondary education institutions to get people to go to university, even if they'd have been better at a tech college or another alternative. The idea seems to be, 'Intelligent people go to university, therefore if more people go to university then there'll be more intelligent people'. Which of course led to more and more places being renamed 'University of...' so they can claim more people are going to university :?

Stone
Ah, understood. I thought they'd introduced a new scheme or something.

I guess that goes some way to explaining why most new graduates I've worked with in the past few years have been surprisingly useless.
Locked